Wikipedia:Patent nonsense: Difference between revisions
rv vandalism |
{{guideline}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{guideline}} |
||
{{shortcut|[[WP:PN]]}} |
{{shortcut|[[WP:PN]]}} |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
*[[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines]] |
*[[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines]] |
||
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy]] |
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy]] |
||
⚫ | |||
[[de:Wikipedia:Wirres Zeug]] |
[[de:Wikipedia:Wirres Zeug]] |
||
Line 49: | Line 51: | ||
[[ja:Wikipedia:無意味な記述]] |
[[ja:Wikipedia:無意味な記述]] |
||
[[zh:Wikipedia:胡言乱语]] |
[[zh:Wikipedia:胡言乱语]] |
||
⚫ |
Revision as of 15:51, 16 May 2005
This page documents an English Wikipedia guideline. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
[[Category:Wikipedia {{{1}}}s|Patent nonsense]]
Wikipedia, writers and editors contribute lots of brilliant prose, but occasionally some patent nonsense. This falls into a couple of categories:
- Total nonsense--i.e., text or random characters that has no assignable meaning at all.
- Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irremediably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to try to make heads or tails of it.
Not to be confused with...
The following, while often regrettable, are not patent nonsense. Check the Deletion policy for information on how to handle these things.:
- Patented content or copyrighted works (nonsense or not)
- Really poorly written content (See Why Aren't These Pages Copy-edited?)
- Partisan screed, or opinion masquerading as fact
- Religious excogitations
- Incompetent and/or immature material
- Flame bait entries
- Obscene remarks.
- Vandalism (See dealing with vandalism)
- Text translated or written by someone who is not a native English speaker (see Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English)
- Hoaxes
- Fictional story material (characters, settings, etc. which are only interesting to fans)
Dealing with patent nonsense
There are various ways to deal with total nonsense - use your good judgment to decide which is most appropriate:
- Replace it with brilliant prose.
- Move it to the latest Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense page.
- Move it to the article's talk page.
- Move it to the user's talk page.
- Remove it from the article if there is anything left in the article after that.
However, if anybody objects, because they believe that the content is not total nonsense, then it's best to discuss the issue with them, and try to reach a consensus. In particular, if someone says that they think they can rework the "nonsense" into something worthwhile, then please give them some time and space to do so.
If an article contains nothing but patent nonsense, use your good judgment to decide whether to:
- list it on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion
- replace it with a link to Wikipedia:Speedy deletions
- delete it straightaway (only if you are a sysop)
- add the tag {{nonsense}}, which automatically lists it on CAT:CSD