Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Gene Poole/genepooleisevil

User talk:Gene Poole/genepooleisevil

The only purpose this page serves is to justify Gene's abuse of other editors. He has a history if incivility in the past, and whenever they retaliate to his attacks, he lists it on this page. Only two of the editors on the entire page are actual vandals; everyone else it a legitimate editor who had a comment taken out of context to make it seem like they're a vandal, or a troll, or any form of abuser. Yes, people have made pages before about their favorite vandals, or their favorite impersonators, but none of the people on this page have done anything to deserve this kind of treatment. He keeps adding a section where I called him 'a dick'; this is not true. I said he was acting like a dick, and I don't very much appreciate being labeled as an abuser when he himself is constantly monitored to prevent any more incivility. See also: Gene's failed RFA (read the "oppose" comments), and Gene's request for arbitration (archive of the discussion). Captain Wikify ^Argh! 20:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment is this because he called you a dick? -N 20:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

No, but I can't say I didn't expect someone to ask. Gene and I are in the middle of a dispute, so this was a terrible time for me to make this MFD, but the page is not fair to other editors - just click any name on it, only two are not legitimate - and Gene is known to have a temper. See my comment on George's page. Also, he didn't actually call me a dick, he's claiming that I called him one, when I was really referring to the Wikipedia policy. There's a big difference between a dick and a WP:DICK. --Captain Wikify ^Argh! 20:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and one more thing: I actually saw this page before I even read Gene's talk page and became involved and the dispute, and I planned on MFDing it; I didn't have the time to at that point. Now I do, and although it is quite possibly the worst timed MFD in Wikipedia history, if you look at it objectively, it really is abusive and should not exist. --Captain Wikify ^Argh! 20:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The page is a collection of direct quotes, along with timestamps, of personal invective posted about me by various editors over a period of years. It is directly relevant to me, and is presented in a humorous context to serve as an illustration of WP:NPA. Captain Wikify, who is the latest addition to the list, recently appeared out of nowhere and posted threats, abuse and uncivil comments on my talk page for which he has been warned on 2 separate occasions [1], [2] by an admin. Contrary to his repeated claims Captain Wikify did not accuse me of acting like a dick. He clearly stated that I was "being a dick" - and he did it on 2 separate occasions [3], [4]. He doesn't seem to understand the meaning of his own words. He also seems completely confused about the operations of WP, and seems to believe that WP:DICK is a policy. --Gene_poole 22:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, Gene, but you seem to be a little mixed up there: I did not threaten or abuse you. I jumped in to comment on a situation because you were "acting like a WP:DICK", which is a far cry from "acting like a dick", or, as you implied with your page, flat-out calling you a dick. You have serious civility issues and I honestly can't believe you've gone this long without a permablock. And as far as warnings go, no, I have not been warned for anything. George advised that I leave the situation alone, but you were the one who was warned - repeatedly, I might add - for incivility and making threatening comments. Your involvement in this MFD is completely unnecessary; you can, in no way, really defend this page, and the only reason you even posted here was to belittle me. Kindly leave and allow the process to work itself out. This page was created by you, yes, but you do not own it. --Captain Wikify ^Argh! 23:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)