Talk:The Traitor and the Jew: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Wikiganda of Finkelsteinist Ilk== |
==Wikiganda of Finkelsteinist Ilk== |
||
The section "Criticism by Other Academics" appears to be little more than Finkelstienism, a neolism named after its foremost practitioner, Norman Finkelstein, a professional anti-Semite of Jewish ancestry. Finkelsteinism is the practice of obscuring an ideological challenge by drowning it in |
The section "Criticism by Other Academics" appears to be little more than Finkelstienism, a neolism named after its foremost practitioner, Norman Finkelstein, a professional anti-Semite of Jewish ancestry. Finkelsteinism is the practice of obscuring an ideological challenge by drowning it in minor footnote challenges and personal attacks against the author. |
||
Ultimately it doesn't matter whether a quote was on this page or that, or that it was from an earliler source, what matters is the basic thesis, that a revered Quebec nationalist ideologist was a vicious anti-Semitic racist and that the nationalists have failed to denounce him. All else is smokescreen.[[User:68.5.64.178|68.5.64.178]] 00:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
Ultimately it doesn't matter whether a quote was on this page or that, or that it was from an earliler source, what matters is the basic thesis, that a revered Quebec nationalist ideologist was a vicious anti-Semitic racist and that the nationalists have failed to denounce him. All else is smokescreen.[[User:68.5.64.178|68.5.64.178]] 00:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:27, 25 June 2007
I removed the links and quotes re the advocacy group, Vigile net which also included someone's personal "translation" from French to English of criticisms.
I also removed a "fact" notice that somebody inserted in a section that is a quote from the book.
Is an Wikipedia editor's own "translation" of a French language article acceptable aas a reliable source? J Martin81 23:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Article by Gary Caldwell not Original Research
The criticism made by Gary Caldwell in the article "The Sins of the Abbé Groulx", published in Literary Review of Canada, volume 3, issue 7, July-August 1994, pages 17 to 23 is NOT original research. The removal of this material by J Martin81 is not justified as it is properly referenced. If the expression "asserted in essence" poses a problem, it can be changed for something else. I will revert to my last version unless serious objections are raised. -- Mathieugp 23:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikiganda of Finkelsteinist Ilk
The section "Criticism by Other Academics" appears to be little more than Finkelstienism, a neolism named after its foremost practitioner, Norman Finkelstein, a professional anti-Semite of Jewish ancestry. Finkelsteinism is the practice of obscuring an ideological challenge by drowning it in minor footnote challenges and personal attacks against the author.
Ultimately it doesn't matter whether a quote was on this page or that, or that it was from an earliler source, what matters is the basic thesis, that a revered Quebec nationalist ideologist was a vicious anti-Semitic racist and that the nationalists have failed to denounce him. All else is smokescreen.68.5.64.178 00:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)