User talk:Maksym Taran: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:51, 25 June 2007

Looking for articles to work on?

Hello, Shadow demon. I'm SuggestBot, a Wikipedia bot that helps new members contribute to Wikipedia. Based on your previous edits, I have made a list of articles you might like to work on. I hope you find this useful. -- SuggestBot 13:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jargon is unavoidable in higher mathematics

Are you planning to put jargon labels on all math articles? The jargon is unavoidable because mathematics is inherently complicated. JRSpriggs 08:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the two articles in question, and actually I do think they could use gentler introductions. But SD, please put such requests on the talk pages of the articles from now on. --Trovatore 09:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworked the first paragraph of large cardinal property; see if that helps at all. --Trovatore 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your rewording is quite an improvement, but I still think Inaccessable cardinal needs something similar. Sorry I put it on the main pages of the articles, but I did think they could have used some clearing up, and the large cardinal one is a lot better now. I'll put something like that on the talk page from now on if I see it.

Revision as of 10:26, 25 June 2007 edit Trovatore (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 37,869 edits →Jargon is unavoidable in higher mathematics: update ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:51, 25 June 2007 edit undo Maksym Taran (talk \| contribs) 281 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I've reworked the first paragraph of [[large cardinal property]]; see if that helps at all. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)		I've reworked the first paragraph of [[large cardinal property]]; see if that helps at all. --[[User:Trovatore\|Trovatore]] 10:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
			:Your rewording is quite an improvement, but I still think [[Inaccessable cardinal]] needs something similar. Sorry I put it on the main pages of the articles, but I did think they could have used some clearing up, and the large cardinal one is a lot better now. I'll put something like that on the talk page from now on if I see it.