Jump to content

Talk:Plastic pressure pipe systems: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Drpipe (talk | contribs)
Pipeup (talk | contribs)
Line 30: Line 30:


Reverted spam from 81.159.9.207 EL. --[[User:Drpipe|Drpipe]] 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Reverted spam from 81.159.9.207 EL. --[[User:Drpipe|Drpipe]] 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Reverted Junker 81 edits, no discussion with other editors of the article, previous edits on other sites suggest that he/she is a spammer --[[User:Pipeup|Pipeup]] 16:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


== Content ==
== Content ==

Revision as of 16:01, 26 June 2007

Editing This Article

Plastic pressure pipe systems is a very niche industry and there are only a handful of people in the world that understand the industry commercially, technically and scientifically. To my knowledge there are no end to end publications of the industry apart from the ones referenced here that are as comprehensive. There is very little that has been published about this industry.

Therefore, please can we encourage you to discuss your edits as some edits have been made without much thought for the intention here and have shown no understanding of the industry or the lack of published material about the industy. Thank you. --Drpipe 14:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible improvements for the future

Please add your comments:


The consensus between the editors of this article has been that the external links are valid and they meet the Wikipedia criteria for external links. The Pipestock site contains copyrighted pictures that are not practical to put up plus technical data sheets and tables that cannot be put within the article. The Effast website contains free downloadable cad drawings that cannot be put within the article.

Clean up

Please add your comments after any edits:

I see that you have archived off the old discussion which I think is good, my only comment would be how do we divied up the archive content over time? I also like the fact that you have left some edit headings for people to post under. --Pipeup 14:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the first line intro of the article relating to the standards that the products are based upon. They have been changed to the new EN standards. --Drpipe 10:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted a change which was vandalisim --Drpipe 17:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted vadalisim by Planetoml --Pipeup 15:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted spam from 81.159.9.207 EL. --Drpipe 15:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Junker 81 edits, no discussion with other editors of the article, previous edits on other sites suggest that he/she is a spammer --Pipeup 16:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content

Please add your comments after any edits:

Minor content addition to the Pipes section--Pipeup 15:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Radiojon has removed all the discussion from the archive, not sure how to get in back. --Grumpyrob 14:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added some detail on WRAS/Wrc and an IL to WRc plus one back to Plastic pressure pipe systems. --Grumpyrob 14:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]