Jump to content

User talk:Joshua Davis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rotiro (talk | contribs)
ask expert
Article needing your attention
Line 15: Line 15:
== tachyons ==
== tachyons ==
Can you check what I added to [[tachyon]]? [[User:Rotiro|Rotiro]] 10:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you check what I added to [[tachyon]]? [[User:Rotiro|Rotiro]] 10:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

==Article needing your attention==
Hi, can you please look at: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid entropy]] and vote? I think more physicists should participate in that particular vote. Thanks. [[User:Dan Gluck|Dan Gluck]] 13:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:54, 28 June 2007

No need to apologize

Hi Joshua, and welcome here. I just came to say that you don't need to apologize as profusely as you did in your edit summary, especially since you're making a good point.

As you have probably noticed, Wikipedia can be a rather strange place with hidden customs. You seem to be doing very well, but if you ever want to ask a question, feel free to contact me. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In behalf of SFC9394, might I ask that you contribute some moderation and/or content for this page. Speaking for the prior contributors, --Ancheta Wis 06:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Parity

Hi Joshua, please reconsider your comments about parity. The parity operator is the operator that takes one between the disconnected components of a group (typically the two components of a rotation group). Ergo, the parity operator can never have determinant +1, since unitary/orthogonal transforms perserve the determinant, and det=+1 is the determinant of the connected component containing the identity. linas 15:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tachyons

Can you check what I added to tachyon? Rotiro 10:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article needing your attention

Hi, can you please look at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluid entropy and vote? I think more physicists should participate in that particular vote. Thanks. Dan Gluck 13:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]