User talk:Dark Executioner: Difference between revisions
←Replaced page with 'Talk to me! You'll see me eventually, on your deathbed.' |
about the statements I removed |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Talk to me! You'll see me eventually, on your deathbed. |
Talk to me! You'll see me eventually, on your deathbed. |
||
==Citations in Slipknot== |
|||
There are two citations placed by you in the last paragraph of the main body of the Slipknot article. Neither one of these citations are properly formatted nor do either of them contain enough information. The format wouldn't be an issue if the citations had any informative value to them. You need to be more specific in both citations. For the magazine citation, list the issue number, page number, article name, and article author; for the television citation, list the program and episode number(or some form of episode identifier). Without this information fact checking and verifiability, the entire purpose of citation, are impossible. I'm going to remove the statement, under the assumption that it will be re-added when you get the proper citation or, if you do not have the information for one or both of those sources, different, equivalent, sources for the statements. --[[User:Wildnox|Wildnox]][[User talk:Wildnox|(talk)]] 22:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:16, 29 June 2007
Talk to me! You'll see me eventually, on your deathbed.
Citations in Slipknot
There are two citations placed by you in the last paragraph of the main body of the Slipknot article. Neither one of these citations are properly formatted nor do either of them contain enough information. The format wouldn't be an issue if the citations had any informative value to them. You need to be more specific in both citations. For the magazine citation, list the issue number, page number, article name, and article author; for the television citation, list the program and episode number(or some form of episode identifier). Without this information fact checking and verifiability, the entire purpose of citation, are impossible. I'm going to remove the statement, under the assumption that it will be re-added when you get the proper citation or, if you do not have the information for one or both of those sources, different, equivalent, sources for the statements. --Wildnox(talk) 22:16, 29 June 2007 (UTC)