User talk:Ursasapien: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ursasapien (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::It's basically the word "cabal", to be honest. Doesn't assume good faith very much. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
::It's basically the word "cabal", to be honest. Doesn't assume good faith very much. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::Well, there are two ways to use the word cabal. One is [[WP:TINC|meta-humor, and it's fine]], and the other basically accuses editors of conspiring against you, which if it isn't a personal attack, it's certainly incivility. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 13:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
:::Well, there are two ways to use the word cabal. One is [[WP:TINC|meta-humor, and it's fine]], and the other basically accuses editors of conspiring against you, which if it isn't a personal attack, it's certainly incivility. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 13:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
I have to agree with Ursa, Sceptre. I also have been civil to TTN and Ned Scott. But it's just not working - they are not letting up. [[User:Angie Y.|Angie Y.]] 00:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::[[Image:Vote Saxon.svg|15px]] can't be deleted as it's on Commons. My page is an in-joke to the editors of the community that watch Doctor Who - and won't offend people, as the joke would fly over the heads of those who don't understand. The userbox you used can and did offend people, and would've been deleted had it been in template space. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 13:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
::::[[Image:Vote Saxon.svg|15px]] can't be deleted as it's on Commons. My page is an in-joke to the editors of the community that watch Doctor Who - and won't offend people, as the joke would fly over the heads of those who don't understand. The userbox you used can and did offend people, and would've been deleted had it been in template space. [[User:Sceptre|Sceptre]] 13:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:59, 1 July 2007
| This is Ursasapien's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Are you sick of it?
Are you sick of TTN's non-consensual, mergist attitude? User:PeaceNT has told me that TTN is not allowed to merge any more episode articles unless aggreement is reached. Angie Y. 20:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I am trying to understand were TTN and others are coming from. As an editor, I tend toward inclusionism versus a cropped and neat encyclopedia. I think this makes Wikipedia a better encyclopedia than Britannica or some others. However, that being said, other editors want to avoid Wikipedia becoming the world's largest collection of fan speculation, trivia, and silliness. I understand their point of view, I just believe that eventually "the creme will rise to the top" and I choose to err on the side of including rather than trimming. That being said, most things on Wikipedia are utterly "undoable." Continue to voice your opinion in a civil manner and I firmly believe we will have a better encyclopedia for it. Ursasapien (talk) 01:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm trying to be civil, but this weirdo (TTN) is not hearing me out. Angie Y. 01:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Regarding TTN, "DIMEist cabal", et al
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Sceptre 12:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have been nothing but civil despite being the victim of extreme incivility. I have been mocked, belittled, and hounded over my editorial POV. I have had pages in my userspace preemptively redirected and my userpage edited without any discussion. I have done my best to assume my attackers are editing in good faith. I apologize for the use of the word "cabal" but the persecution I have experienced has made me paranoid. I honestly wonder if there is not a conspiracy to silence certain viewpoints. Anyway, I think this warning is senseless and would be better directed at others. Ursasapien (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's basically the word "cabal", to be honest. Doesn't assume good faith very much. Sceptre 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, there are two ways to use the word cabal. One is meta-humor, and it's fine, and the other basically accuses editors of conspiring against you, which if it isn't a personal attack, it's certainly incivility. Sceptre 13:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's basically the word "cabal", to be honest. Doesn't assume good faith very much. Sceptre 12:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with Ursa, Sceptre. I also have been civil to TTN and Ned Scott. But it's just not working - they are not letting up. Angie Y. 00:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
can't be deleted as it's on Commons. My page is an in-joke to the editors of the community that watch Doctor Who - and won't offend people, as the joke would fly over the heads of those who don't understand. The userbox you used can and did offend people, and would've been deleted had it been in template space. Sceptre 13:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
