Jump to content

Game tester: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hjorten (talk | contribs)
m Reverted to revision 142946438 by Frecklefoot; spam website. using TW
Line 37: Line 37:
*"Testers" the series [http://up2utube.gametrailers.com/gamepad/index.php?action=fanmovs On Gametrailers.com]
*"Testers" the series [http://up2utube.gametrailers.com/gamepad/index.php?action=fanmovs On Gametrailers.com]
* Game industry veteran, [http://www.sloperama.com/advice/lesson5.htm Tom Sloper's advice "Working as a Tester"]
* Game industry veteran, [http://www.sloperama.com/advice/lesson5.htm Tom Sloper's advice "Working as a Tester"]
* [http://www.gamertestingground.com Game tester] from the [[International Game Developers Association]] (IGDA)
* [http://www.igda.org/breakingin/path_production.htm#test Game tester] from the [[International Game Developers Association]] (IGDA)
** [http://www.igda.org/qa IGDA's Quality Assurance Special Interest Group]
** [http://www.igda.org/qa IGDA's Quality Assurance Special Interest Group]



Revision as of 09:51, 7 July 2007

The role of the game tester in game development primarily involves analyzing video and/or computer games to document software defects as part of a quality control process. While popularized as a dream job for gamers, interactive entertainment software testing is a highly technical field requiring computing expertise, analytic competence, thick skin, and the ability to endure long hours.

Description

Modern video and computer games take from one to three years to develop (depending on scale). Testing begins late in the development process, sometimes from halfway to 75% into development (it starts so late because, until then, there is little to nothing to test). Testers get new builds from the developers on a schedule (daily/weekly) and each version must be uniquely identified in order to map errors to versions. They also test the durability of the game disc through a series of tests that can include how much damage the disc can take before becoming unresponsive, and how glitches can effect how the game runs.

Once the testers get a version, they begin playing the game. Testers must carefully note any errors they uncover. These may range from bugs to art glitches to logic errors and level bugs. Some bugs are easy to document ("Level 5 has a floor tile missing in the opening room"), but many are hard to describe and may take several paragraphs to describe so a developer can replicate or find the bug. On a large-scale game with numerous testers, a tester must first determine whether the bug has already been reported before they can log the bugs themselves. Once a bug has been reported as fixed, the tester has to go back and verify the fix works.

This type of "playing" is tedious and grueling. Usually an unfinished game is not fun to play, especially over and over. A tester may play the same game—or even the same level in a game—over and over for eight hours or more at a time. If testing feature fixes, the tester may have to repeat a large number of sequences just to get to one spot in the game. Understandably, burn-out is common in this field and many use the position just as a means to get a different job in game development. For this reason, game testing is widely considered a "stepping stone" position. This type of job may be taken by college students as a way to audit the industry and determine if it is the type of environment in which they wish to work professionally.

In software development quality assurance, it is common practice to go back through a feature set and ensure that features that once worked still work near the end of development. This kind of aggressive quality assurance—called regression testing—is most difficult for games with a large feature set. If a new bug is discovered in a feature that used to work, once it is fixed, regression testing has to take place again.

Game testing becomes grueling as deadlines loom. Most games go into what is called "crunch time" near deadlines—developers (programmers, artists, game designers and producers) work twelve to fourteen hours a day and the testers must be right there with them, testing late-added features and content. Often during this period staff from other departments may contribute to the testing effort to assist in handling the load.

Many console manufacturers, such as Nintendo, require videotapes of gameplay in order to agree to publish a game. The manufacturer can then agree to manufacture the game or refuse (refusal normally requires fixes before they'll publish a game). Creation of these videotapes of flawless play usually falls on the shoulders of testers since they have the most experience with the games. This can be a gruelling process since one slip-up in gameplay can cost hours of videotaping to be wasted.

Responsibility

In the early days of computer and video games, the developer was in charge of all the testing. Since most games were so limited in scope, this was easy and usually required no more than one or two testers. In some cases, the programmer themselves could handle all of the testing.

As games have become more complex, a larger pool of quality assessment (QA) resources is necessary (sometimes it is called "quality assurance"). This being the case, most publishers have a large QA staff that they have testing various games from different developers.

Usually one group of testers will work on the same game from the beginning of the QA process to the time the game ships (goes "gold"). Thus, they become experts at the game and become familiar with all its nuances and weaknesses. Normally a group of testers will work on from one to two games at a time, depending on each game's scale. As one game nears completion, they may focus more time on it as the QA requirements escalate. Near the end of development, the QA staff may relocate to the development location in order to provide intensive QA work and be easily accessible to developers.

Despite the large QA infrastructure most publishers have, many developers will retain a small group of testers to provide on-the-spot QA from time to time.

Compensation

Despite the job's difficulty, game testing doesn't pay a great deal and is usually paid hourly (around USD$8 - $12 an hour). Testing management is usually more lucrative, but this type of job usually requires years of experience and some type of college degree. For this reason, as mentioned earlier, most game testing jobs are taken as "foot in the door" positions, used as a stepping stone for more lucrative lines of work in game development.

Some employers offer bonuses for the number of bugs a tester finds. While this approach may seem initially reasonable, sadly, it often quickly leads to testers reporting bugs as features they, personally, simply don't care for or to reporting features as bugs simply for the extra money.

The main characters in the 2006 film Grandma's Boy worked as video game testers. The main game used in the movie, called Demonik, was in reality developed by Terminal Reality, but has been cancelled by the publisher.

"Testers", a 2007 webseries, depicts the weekly adventures of a video game tester. The series itself is touted as a viral video game, where the viewer votes and chooses what should happen next.

Template:Vg-industry