User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Is there some third option I'm not seeing?: actually my first choice is that you start being more communicative |
→Is there some third option I'm not seeing?: stop playing games: you have no desire to improve the situation, you want me gone, period. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Chopped to bits? Why? Actually my first choice would be that you simply recognize that as a collaborative project, Wikipedia requires reasonable communication between editors. Right now your behavior reminds me quite a lot of Betacommand, who, as I recall, lost his sysop bit for being unresponsive. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 22:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
Chopped to bits? Why? Actually my first choice would be that you simply recognize that as a collaborative project, Wikipedia requires reasonable communication between editors. Right now your behavior reminds me quite a lot of Betacommand, who, as I recall, lost his sysop bit for being unresponsive. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User talk:Friday|(talk)]] 22:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Please, you want me banned and desysopped, that has been your desire for a long time, my head on your wall. And for what? I bloody respond to people when a response is warranted, look at the history. Its just not in the normal method, not as expansive as others (but my style has always been to the point, not playing games). --[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|Jeffrey O. Gustafson]] - ''[[User:Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Shazaam|Shazaam!]]'' - [[User_Talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson|<*>]] 22:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:32, 9 July 2007
Is there some third option I'm not seeing?
Obviously we cannot make you communicate. However we can choose to not let you contribute until such a time as you see fit to actually collaborate with other editors. Is this what you're looking for? I'd hate to lose you as a contributor, as you do good work here, but you cannot continue to contribute while refusing to communicate with other editors. Friday (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Friday, you'd love to see me get chopped to little bits, so stop that "hate to lose you" crap. I am responding to queries, just not in the normal method. I am not writing anything, so there is no "collaboration." As I have made clear, at no point have I refused any meaningful or legitimate questioning of my actions (and I have reversed several upon request) - and my method of interaction is not refusal to interact, but just not interacting in the method others choose.
- So I am to others dictate how often I archive/blank my talk pages? I am to let others force me into conversations where I have no meaningful input? Apparently I am at the mercy of anyone who wishes to waste my time, when I am not confronting anyone, not editing anything, not taking part in pointless conversations, when all I am doing is deleting random garbage when I get to it, and responding to those who take issue with any deletions quietly, quickly, and curtly. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Chopped to bits? Why? Actually my first choice would be that you simply recognize that as a collaborative project, Wikipedia requires reasonable communication between editors. Right now your behavior reminds me quite a lot of Betacommand, who, as I recall, lost his sysop bit for being unresponsive. Friday (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Please, you want me banned and desysopped, that has been your desire for a long time, my head on your wall. And for what? I bloody respond to people when a response is warranted, look at the history. Its just not in the normal method, not as expansive as others (but my style has always been to the point, not playing games). --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)