Talk:Fred Thompson controversies: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:37, 10 July 2007

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

"Controversy" must be sourced

Anything that appears in this article must be characterized as controversial by secondary reliable sources, or it will be removed, per WP:BLP. Just sourcing events and putting them in this article as controversies is not allowed. Notable reliable sources must be cited showing that there is an actual controversy over an issue, not just ranting on blogs. - Crockspot 16:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson & the 1st Amendment

From a conservative standpoint, Thompson's wholehearted support for the McCain-Feingold Act certainly puts him in hot water, as a direct assault on the 1st Amendment. - MSTCrow 17:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conservatism

It appears there's some question about how conservative Thompson is, particularly in relation to McCain-Feingold (see above) and abortion. In both cases, he now claims to hew to more standard conservative/GOP positions. These questions are getting shoved into unrelated sections of the article right now (often in very POV forms) and deserve their own section. Anyone want to take a stab at starting this section? I won't have time until probably this weekend at the earliest. Jdb1972 20:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see controversy pages about other Presidential candidates

It seems to me that this page violates the Wikipedia NPOV guidelines as regards content forking. I don't see "controversies" sections for other presidential candidates. A "controversies" section should either be a standard for all current candidates or should be unacceptable.

Revision as of 20:37, 10 July 2007 edit Dtoler (talk \| contribs) 31 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:37, 10 July 2007 edit undo Dtoler (talk \| contribs) 31 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== I don't see controversy pages about other Presidential candidates ==		== I don't see controversy pages about other Presidential candidates ==

	It seems to me that this page violates the Wikipedia NPOV guidelines as regards [[article~~:Wikipedia~~:Content_forking\|content forking]]. I don't see "controversies" sections for other presidential candidates. A "controversies" section should either be a standard for all current candidates or should be unacceptable.		It seems to me that this page violates the Wikipedia NPOV guidelines as regards [[article:Content_forking\|content forking]]. I don't see "controversies" sections for other presidential candidates. A "controversies" section should either be a standard for all current candidates or should be unacceptable.