User talk:Woohookitty: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive9.
Wikidudeman (talk | contribs)
m The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Line 69: Line 69:
Best,
Best,
Joe
Joe

== The Tireless Contributor Barnstar ==

{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:Barnstar-rotating.gif|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I'm awarding you this barnstar for your great work on Wikipedia! [[User:Wikidudeman|'''<font color="blue">Wikidudeman</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Wikidudeman|(talk)]]</sup> 12:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 12:05, 27 July 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive9. Archives prior to 16 June 2007 were compiled by Werdnabot/Shadowbot3 and can be found at the right hand side of this page. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Strange performance

I see that you just edited Template:Baseball Year, which I just noticed is giving strange performance when it's used twice in close succession. See the Philadelphia Phillies article, for example.--BillFlis 14:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Citylaugh

It seems that Superdeng has found yet another puppet to master. User:Citylaugh is making edits that seem alot like his work. He reverted the Battle of Budapest article's current version to this old version. He began his work in May, reverting its current version to old one (which oddly was the one that existed before I made edits in the article). I reverted it back, and he left the article alone after a while for a long time. Now he did it again, identifying me as "vandal Kurt" as he reverted it again back to this old version. I reverted it back to the former version. I would also like to note that his behaviour and edits are very similiar to user Speaksure, someone who reverted the article back to the same version Citylaugh does everytime I edited it (as a matter of fact, Speaksure's all edits were reverts in articles that I had edited). Regards, --Kurt Leyman 20:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Country creation lists

Hello again.

I have now proposed the deletion of List of states by date of self-determination and the merger of List of countries by date of independence and List of countries by date of statehood. Maybe this will get us some progress.Inge 11:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjaya on AI template

I remember a discussion we had a while back, claiming that if Sanjaya was no longer being constantly discussed in the media, his spot on the notable alum would be rediscussed. To maintain a NPOV, I'm wondering whether or not you think he should still stay on the list. Since I think that I search for all information related to him, I'm not sure how much the layman still hears about him. I'm assuming nothing, haha, so should he be removed now?  hmwith  talk 14:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, however much I personally would want him to have an amazing Top 20 release to show all of the skeptics, I doubt he will. Bye, Sanjaya!  hmwith  talk 14:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kamen Rider

Kamen Rider doesn't really fit into "anime and manga" as it's a live action drama (that was at one point serialized in a manga).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 21:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D: Neither is anything ending with "ranger" but I've fixed that :P—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:12, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted template

Hi, Woohookitty, a few months ago you deleted Template:Infobox Israel. In the deletion discussions it was specifically requested that the template's talk page be preserved, as it contained an important RfC. Where can this talk page be found?--Doron 22:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Woohookitty,I'd like to thank you for asking Ryulong to step down-he didn't deserve adminship.--Xterra1 22:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please come and vote on the Ward Churchill Misconduct issues deletion. It was speedily deleted as a Coatrack but Getaway and Verklempt are contesting the deletion. They are winning at the moment and it may go down to the wire. Albion moonlight 10:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply Woohookitty. I've avoided the Wiki since having my edit burned. RE: Please read Wikipedia:External links. We're kind of picky when it comes to listing forums. Please don't take it personally. --Woohookitty(meow) 23:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC) This was re your removing a link to Electric Bicycle's Users Forum I added to the Electric Bicycle page. I'll agree with the policy as long as it is fair and consistent. But since other forums of identical relevance have been added and not removed it appears it was personal. The http://groups.google.com/group/Tidalforce link should either be put back or all the other links to forums removed, unless this is personal. I could add a lot to Wikipedia about the TidalForce subcatagory of Electric Bicycles but wouldn't waste my time on something so unfairly run by people who follow whatever rules suit them. I am known as Joe and am a manager at the tidalforce group. I have no affiliation with any electric bicycle manufacturer, just a love for electric bicycles. I take my unfair treatment by Wikipedia very personally since I was without question singled out for my first contribution that took me a long time to do and probably took you a few seconds to remove. Forgive me for venting. I'm sure most of what you do is good. It just wasn't for me personally. Best, Joe

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I'm awarding you this barnstar for your great work on Wikipedia! Wikidudeman (talk) 12:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]