User talk:Rlest: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:39, 28 July 2007

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

There are only two decent users on Wikipedia, Anonymous Dissident and Daniel. The vandals and trolls have taken over this place and the people who are here to build the encyclopedia have to deal with total shit from the trolls.

Bye

Good Bye Rlest, I wish you the best of luck and happiness where ever you go. --Chris ^g 10:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Rlest 10:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then Rlest. If you are leaving, then I wish you the best of luck. We say goodbye to a great contributor and a nice guy. I hope you do decide to return under another name, but whether you choose to disclose who you are under that new name or not is up to you. Thanks, and goodbye -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I declined your initial request at AIV for you to be blocked indef so you could leave as that is not what we do. I have however blocked you for 24 hours for this completely unacceptable edit summary. Please consider returning after your block is over, creating new account after new account is not the answer I'm afraid. Ryan Postlethwaite 11:33, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep I know but I tried to apologise to Miranda but she wouldn't accept it. Rlest 11:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

very bad spelling of afraid

User:Alkivar uses edit summaries like that all the time but hes never blocked. Rlest 11:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rlest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Didn't do out wrong

Decline reason:

No - an intent to harass was clear in that edit summary. Also, it's spelled "owt". — Martinp23 11:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually Martin its not so haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Rlest 11:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ::: User:Alkivar uses edit summaries like that all the time but hes never blocked. [[User:Rlest|Rlest]] 11:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 {{unblock reviewed|1=Didn't do out wrong|decline=No - an intent to harass was clear in that edit summary. Also, it's spelled "owt". — [[User:Martinp23|Mart]]'''[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]''' 11:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)}}
+ Actually '''Martin''' its not so haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. [[User:Rlest|Rlest]] 11:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)