Talk:Veoh

Why no article?

Can someone please explain why this article is not allowed? There are articles for lots of other computer programs, even controversial ones such as Kazaa so I don't understand why not Veoh. I would find an informative article useful right now. --Ishel99 00:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

1. This essentially appeared as an advertisement.
2. Wikipedia articles must be verifiable in reliable published sources.

—Centrx→talk • 04:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree I think that there should be some kind of article about Veoh. It is a very popular website, and I think there should at least be some kind of page about it. I am going to work over this weekend on drafting a comprehensive page about Veoh, and I will post it to the talk section. --Cooleymd 01:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Please someone make an article about Veoh. It is a very good site for vewing various videos, most of all animation. Everybody loves it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.24.200.185 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 12 Feb 2007 (UTC)

WP:ILIKEIT is not a valid reason for including an article in Wikipedia --Iamunknown 03:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Youtube is on the wiki. Why not veoh? What kind of nazis ran this place anyhow? Has the wiki got sponsorship from youtube? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 125.238.227.87 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 15 Feb 2007 (UTC)

Cute --Iamunknown 03:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

what is this if not an advertisement: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youtube youtube is:"Invention of the Year (2006)" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Takarada (talk • contribs) 17:22, 15 Feb 2007 (UTC)

Yup. Youtube is the invention of the year, as is clearly verifiable from reliable sources such as, oh, say, TIME magazine. If an article can be written about Veoh with verifiable, reliable sources, I'm sure it'll be kept. --Iamunknown 03:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I came here for an unbiased overview of their downloadable player. The deletion recommendation needs to be removed, people want info. 71.231.13.21 04:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia NOT a dumping ground for random information. That said, the article will go through our deletion process, and then a consensual decision will be made. --Iamunknown 05:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh get off it. Wiki is a joke. Veoh needs an extensive article, there's is still much more that is needed to be known about it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.117.157.7 (talk • contribs).

I agree on BOTH accounts.

-G

Plug ins

Can someone explain what plug-ins are needed to access this website? Whenever their content is posted on TV Links, it doesn't work. Nqnpipnr 21:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Legality

Is there any information on how this evades copyright violations? There are a few site users who remove videos after being told they're violating copyrights, but why are some videos (of the same series, for example) allowed when others aren't?

veoh sucks they have a lot of anime but delete actual episodes they should be suedSno777 19:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)