Talk:Product (business): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:50, 21 August 2007

I'm currently studying marketing and there are things such as an actual product which is a products parts, styling, features, brand name and other attributes which combine to create a core product. A core product is the services or benefits that a consumer is really receiving when they purchase the product. Do you think these belong here or elsewhere? They are reasonably short explanations so I think creating a seperate page for them is a bit of a waste. Thanks. Prof. Alex 00:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three Aspects

"There are three aspects to any product or service:"

Or two maybe? Anyway, two are listed, or maybe four.

 Joaquin  7 May 6

Rather than "bundle of benefits or satisfactions" perhaps "bundle of features"

--chrish 06:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey can i know what is the difference between a commodity , producgt and a brand?

Expert tag on the page

Hi! Editors,I have added some content to make article less controversial.If all editors agree then I propose to delete the Tag.Holy|Warrior 07:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expert tag removed anybody having contention.Plz discuss. HW 12:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

arrgh. wrong window!

can someone revert the (unintentional) changes i made to this article. i posted into the wrong window entirely! sorry. i can't find instructions on reverting changes. Randommouse 06:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. figured it out, and reverted.

'A physical item that is offered for sale should not automatically be considered a product if it has no market. Like 95% of patents they are at best interesting diversions and at worst a waste of time.'

I find this a very confusing thing to claim. Says who? Something that is produced is per definition a product, even if there's no market for it. There are plenty examples of goods and/or services that are created for own use, and that would (probably) never sell if brought up on the market. Doesn't mean it's not a product of that individual's labor. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.207.41.245 (talk • contribs) 16:59 28 February 2007.

Construction tag

How come? It doesn't seem a very active construction site. Jim.henderson 17:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the tag on when I was working on it pretty steadily. I've taken it off now. -- • • • Blue Pixel 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Product groups - Categories

I think this section needs to be re-written in a more neutral/general way, without talking about specific business.

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 How come?  It doesn't seem a very active construction site.  [[User:Jim.henderson|Jim.henderson]] 17:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 :I put the tag on when I was working on it pretty steadily. I've taken it off now. --[[User:Blue Pixel|<font style="color:cadetblue"> &#8226; &#8226; &#8226; Blue Pixel </font>]] 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+== Product groups - Categories ==
+I think this section needs to be re-written in a more neutral/general way, without talking about specific business.