Talk:Shortcut (computing): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Supermagle (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Is a tutorial for Windows shortcuts really needed? Would ''you'' find a tutorial in an encyclopedia? I don't think so... [[User:Takua108|Takua108]] 02:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
Is a tutorial for Windows shortcuts really needed? Would ''you'' find a tutorial in an encyclopedia? I don't think so... [[User:Takua108|Takua108]] 02:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
I concur - this is somewhat out of place in an encyclopedia. [[User:Supermagle|Supermagle]] 10:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Shortcut Vulnerability == |
== Shortcut Vulnerability == |
Revision as of 10:55, 13 September 2007
this key does not exist in my version of winxp:
you do not say which versions of windows this is for.
59.100.160.238 11:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)fastdude
Navigate to the following key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \ SOFTWARE \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion \ Explorer \ Shell Icons
I know up to 7.x, I haven't used a Macintosh since. Nastajus 17:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
.pif
I somewhat remember that shortcuts to MSDOS programs are (or were) .pif files rather than .lnk. They also containes various DOS compatibility settings. --Apoc2400 06:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Tutorial
Is a tutorial for Windows shortcuts really needed? Would you find a tutorial in an encyclopedia? I don't think so... Takua108 02:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I concur - this is somewhat out of place in an encyclopedia. Supermagle 10:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Shortcut Vulnerability
Is the section on the shortcut vulnerability really needed? It seems like useless fluff to me; after all, I'm not sure Wikipedia is supposed to be a walking archive of exploits ;) nneonneo 05:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
symlinks
Whatare the differences between unix soft/hard links and shortcuts?