Talk:Squad automatic weapon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Looper5920 (talk | contribs) assessed |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
3. Noticed FN FAL assault rifle is no related with M249, but with M240, what is a FN MAG machine gun licensed and manufactured in USA. |
3. Noticed FN FAL assault rifle is no related with M249, but with M240, what is a FN MAG machine gun licensed and manufactured in USA. |
||
==I just saw this== |
|||
"Therefore, in many modern armies, military doctrine requires the ordinary soldier to avoid using his weapon's fully automatic mode " |
|||
Read Army doctrine until the 1980s was for fully automatic fire. Do they not count as modern? |
Revision as of 14:18, 19 September 2007
![]() | Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. M249 is downsized M240 General Purpose Machine gun, not heavy barrelled Assault rifle.
2. Both M249 and RPK uses same ammo as Assault rifles (RPK-74->AK-74, RPK->AK-47 resp. M249->M16)
3. Noticed FN FAL assault rifle is no related with M249, but with M240, what is a FN MAG machine gun licensed and manufactured in USA.
I just saw this
"Therefore, in many modern armies, military doctrine requires the ordinary soldier to avoid using his weapon's fully automatic mode "
Read Army doctrine until the 1980s was for fully automatic fire. Do they not count as modern?