Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Leet World: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bschott (talk | contribs)
m add {{spa}}
Line 8: Line 8:
*'''Delete''' Non-notable fancruft, delete under [[WP:WEB]]--[[User:Jac16888|Jac16888]] 18:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Non-notable fancruft, delete under [[WP:WEB]]--[[User:Jac16888|Jac16888]] 18:16, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*This article should not be deleted, seeing that it does meet the Notability Guidelines. I consulted the administrator that first deleted the article, and he has allowed it for creation. [[User:FightingRaven531|FightingRaven531]] 19:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*This article should not be deleted, seeing that it does meet the Notability Guidelines. I consulted the administrator that first deleted the article, and he has allowed it for creation. [[User:FightingRaven531|FightingRaven531]] 19:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
:*<small>— [[User:FightingRaven531|FightingRaven531]] ([[User talk:FightingRaven531|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FightingRaven531|contribs]]) has made [[Wikipedia:Single purpose account|few or no other edits]] outside this topic. {{ #if: {{{2|}}} | The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment was added at {{{2}}} (UTC{{{3|}}}).}}</small>. -[[User:Flubeca|<span style="color:green;font-weight:bold;">Flubeca</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Flubeca|<span style="color:blue;font-weight:bold;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 19:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - It can't be deleted under [[WP:WEB]] as it asserts notability. That's the problem though it only asserts it, it doesn't demonstrate it. It appears to be just another fancruft [[Machinima]] series that doesn't stand out from any other of its type. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 19:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - It can't be deleted under [[WP:WEB]] as it asserts notability. That's the problem though it only asserts it, it doesn't demonstrate it. It appears to be just another fancruft [[Machinima]] series that doesn't stand out from any other of its type. ---- [[User:WebHamster|<font color="#000000">'''W'''eb'''H'''amste</font><font color="#0000ff">r</font>]] 19:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*The Leet World has been around for approximately 41 days and has gotten approximately 139 plus users in that amount of time. In addition large sums of unregistered users each day come to watch The Leet World. It is a recognized machinima along side other machinimas such as Red vs. Blue. [[User:The real bongoboy|The real bongoboy]] 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
*The Leet World has been around for approximately 41 days and has gotten approximately 139 plus users in that amount of time. In addition large sums of unregistered users each day come to watch The Leet World. It is a recognized machinima along side other machinimas such as Red vs. Blue. [[User:The real bongoboy|The real bongoboy]] 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 19 September 2007

The Leet World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Recreated CSD A7. Non-Notable movies made from counterstrike. -FlubecaTalk 17:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - It can't be deleted under WP:WEB as it asserts notability. That's the problem though it only asserts it, it doesn't demonstrate it. It appears to be just another fancruft Machinima series that doesn't stand out from any other of its type. ---- WebHamster 19:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Leet World has been around for approximately 41 days and has gotten approximately 139 plus users in that amount of time. In addition large sums of unregistered users each day come to watch The Leet World. It is a recognized machinima along side other machinimas such as Red vs. Blue. The real bongoboy 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without prejudice. Allow recreation ONLY if it can meet WP:V which it can not right now. If the editors can find multiple books with a chapter about this, magazine articles about nothing but this, or national news programs reporting on this, then I would change my mine. It all boils down to national news coverage or coverage in multiple national/international magazines. If we don't have at least 2-3 sources like that (minimum) the article has to go. --Brian(view my history)/(How am I doing?) 04:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]