Jump to content

User talk:Ariwara: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Robdurbar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
AVIosad (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
Cheers
Cheers
[[User:Robdurbar|Robdurbar]] 13:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
[[User:Robdurbar|Robdurbar]] 13:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

== Enlightenment Template discussion ==

Hi! I am writing to ask if you would be interested in taking part in a discusiion I have started over at [[Template talk:Enlightenment]] on the inclusion criteria - I remember you took part in the earlier discussions. Sorry for spamming you. --[[User:AVIosad|AVIosad]]<sup>([[User talk:AVIosad|talk]])</sup> 14:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:14, 21 September 2007

Thanks for trying to bring some common sense to Roma people edit war. You may perhaps ask for page protection - I have seen such situations and there's no other reasonable way to deal with them. I have neither time nor stamina left to spent it on this topic. Pavel Vozenilek 01:02, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Information about a Requests for arbitration

I started Request of Arbitration due to insults from User:Sumnakay. Since you are knowledgeable of the situation, you may add qualified statement there. Pavel Vozenilek 28 June 2005 22:23 (UTC)

Country, Nation and State

I was wondering if you would be interested in helping me in a bit of a project. I think at the moment the various pages on 'country', 'nation' and 'state' are vague, contradictory and often repeat each other. I would like to see a page along the lines of British Isles (terminology) that attempts to describe:

  • a. The technical differences betweeen the terms
  • b. The informal, often inaccurate, uses of the terms
  • c. Political motivations behind the mis-use or appropriation of the various terms

I think personally that creating such a page would be better than attempting to fit the info into any of the one pages - such as 'country', 'nation' or 'state', which are trying to do differnt things.

Now I'm not going to pretend that I'm gonna be capable of completing such an article myself, but I'd rather present it on Wikipedia in a relatively complete state, than as a 'work in progress'.

I was wondering if you would take a look at my first - relatively crude - draft here. Feel free to - indeed, please do - make changes or recommended changes.

Cheers Robdurbar 13:20, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enlightenment Template discussion

Hi! I am writing to ask if you would be interested in taking part in a discusiion I have started over at Template talk:Enlightenment on the inclusion criteria - I remember you took part in the earlier discussions. Sorry for spamming you. --AVIosad(talk) 14:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]