Talk:Bebe's Kids: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:05, 21 September 2007

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Start

Why is EVERYONE badmouthing the video game?

I played it (A few minutes ago) and it looks good. RocketMaster 06:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, because the video game sucks. 67.164.200.123 00:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was, quite possibly, the worst game ever made. The graphics were terrible, the music was nauseating, complete lack of useful documentation and the play control was so bad that it was actually described in a letter written to Nintendo and published in Nintendo Power magazine as "Akin to attempting to dance Swan Lake with an elephant strapped to your back." And then there's the Haunted House. Four. Years. Unsubstantiated, true. But still, four years before the greatest minds of Gamefaqs actually managed to come up with a way to beat the fourth level. So, yeah. That's why.

I wanted to add my review of this game to the article, but they aren't letting me. --BHMode 10:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Racism?

Shouldn't there be something about controversy over the question of racism (not that I've seen the film myself)? I found it mentioned in the "list of video games considered the worst ever", and was surprised that it wasn't mentioned here. --Lenoxus 02:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo Seal of Quality?

How did the video game get the Nintendo Seal of Quality when it's a horrible game?

Nintendo gave everything that came out on any nintendo system at the time it's "seal of quality"

WHAT?

Remove that dumb Trivia complaint by Wikipedia. Why is that tag hanging over this article when there is a shiitload of other film articles that have a Trivia section that equally matches the length of the main article itself?? Is it because the article was more popular with white culture, thus making the trivia additions less monitored? I'm not going to pull out the race card until a wikipedia admin can give me a logical explanation as to why the aforementioned articles weren't tagged as well.. Panda

Revision as of 21:05, 21 September 2007 edit 98.193.101.49 (talk) →‎WHAT?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:05, 21 September 2007 edit undo 98.193.101.49 (talk) →‎WHAT? Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:
	== WHAT? ==		== WHAT? ==

	Remove that dumb Trivia complaint by Wikipedia. Why is that tag hanging over this article when there is a shiitload of other film articles that have a Trivia section that equally matches the main article itself?? Is it because the article was more popular with white culture, thus making the trivia additions less monitored? I'm not going to pull out the race card until a wikipedia admin can give me a logical explanation as to why the aforementioned articles weren't tagged as well.. Panda		Remove that dumb Trivia complaint by Wikipedia. Why is that tag hanging over this article when there is a shiitload of other film articles that have a Trivia section that equally matches the length of the main article itself?? Is it because the article was more popular with white culture, thus making the trivia additions less monitored? I'm not going to pull out the race card until a wikipedia admin can give me a logical explanation as to why the aforementioned articles weren't tagged as well.. Panda