Talk:Hugh Sung: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:45, 29 September 2007

Hang on

This article is about a leading faculty member of one of the most prestigious music conservatories in the USA. In addition to his musical contributions, he is playing a significant role in introducing innovative technologies to enhance the performance, pedagogy and cultural dissemination of Classical Music.

Are you Hugh Sung? -FisherQueen (Talk) 04:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this article was authored by Hugh Sung

Please refer to credentials on the Curtis website here:

How do you think that the WP:AUTO guideline applies to this article? -FisherQueen (Talk) 04:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All events and references in this article are accurate and verifiable. I can delete questionable adjectives to maintain a more neutral tone if necessary (ie, "passionate", etc.), but given the direct connections to numerous established classical musicians and institutions contained in the subject of this article, i would request consideration to maintain its presence in the Wikipedia. Many thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hughsung (talk • contribs) 04:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you think that WP:COI applies to this article? — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 04:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your inquiry - upon reviewing the WP:COI guidelines, i can understand why self-authorship can pose serious questions regarding the neutrality of the article. I would certainly be open to suggestions on editing the article to be more in compliance with the spirit of Wikipedia - this is my first article and quite a learning experience! Thanks in advance for your help and suggestions. -HughSung

Revision as of 04:33, 29 September 2007 edit Timotab (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,137 edits another question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:45, 29 September 2007 edit undo Hughsung (talk \| contribs) 54 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:How do you think that [[WP:COI]] applies to this article? — [[User:Timotab\|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab\|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab\|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 04:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)		:How do you think that [[WP:COI]] applies to this article? — [[User:Timotab\|Timotab]] [[User_talk:Timotab\|<sup>Timothy (not Tim </sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Timotab\|<sup>dagnabbit!)</sup>]] 04:33, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

			Thank you for your inquiry - upon reviewing the [[WP:COI]] guidelines, i can understand why self-authorship can pose serious questions regarding the neutrality of the article. I would certainly be open to suggestions on editing the article to be more in compliance with the spirit of Wikipedia - this is my first article and quite a learning experience! Thanks in advance for your help and suggestions. -[[User:hughsung\|HughSung]]