Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (historical)/Talk pages: Difference between revisions
ImranRamji (talk | contribs) |
ImranRamji (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::I comment your comment. [[User:Bigdawgs9|bigdawgs9]] 00:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
:::I comment your comment. [[User:Bigdawgs9|bigdawgs9]] 00:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::::Comment [[User:ImranRamji|ImranRamji]] 01:01, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Annotation == |
== Annotation == |
Revision as of 01:01, 2 October 2007
This page is currently under construction.
Trying a sample discussion: "an example of a well-formatted discussion" seems as neither a source nor a result.
I'm not sure that it is good to put (not source) identations with source bullet points (at the same line). Possibly it would be better to write it like this:
: # [[Wikipedia:User page|ElefantLuvr]] 01:22, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Or like this:
- ElefantLuvr 01:22, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
--New user, Vikasatkin 15:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC) -- New user, Zerrot 18:42, 13 August 2007 (PST)
- I don't believe it! 66.131.107.160 01:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- lies
- republican
- democratic
Overall, these tutorials seem pretty good to me. --Eddiehu 23:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Try that date stamp again! --Eddiehu 23:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Third time's the charm --Eddiehu 23:10, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
here we go again --Eddiehu 23:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
PST or bust! --Eddiehu 23:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- OK, but what does PST mean? Pacific Std Time? UKoch 14:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Wow, this is almost programming! BTLOMS 09:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I agree with myself for the following reasons: 09:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm usually correct
- I think I'm usually correct
- I may be usually correct
- I could possibly be correct
- Yeah
- Well sir, I think you are never correct and I have this and this to show you Nribeiro 00:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I wonder how much it will rain this month Ekross 16:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Indenting
- Good for the following reasons
- helps with clarity
- easy to read
- better understanding
- Visually pleasing
- Makes Wikipedia better! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.19.195.78 (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Second discussion
I will now talk with myself.--Cube lurker 21:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- No I will not.--Cube lurker 21:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I am here briefly but not for long Ideologeme 08:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I will go soon Ideologeme 08:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Good luck! ~user:orngjce223 how am I typing? 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- VERY VERY good luck 143.166.226.43 20:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Good luck! ~user:orngjce223 how am I typing? 16:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't get it 22:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.244.236.58 (talk)
Interesting, very interesting indeed 66.217.176.6 05:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- I also want to comment something 194.121.90.163 08:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Very interesting —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.14 (talk) 10:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Interesting, you say? Well, if you say so [1]--BrendanJWood 00:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree; this is enormously interesting. Maybe. I'm not positive. (Paixpirate 23:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC))
- I comment your comment. bigdawgs9 00:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Annotation
Don't mean to intrude, but these are terribly wrong:
- translation
- second translation
- third translation
- third and a half translation
Shouldn't it be made better and better by us? Rudzielec 13:22, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- It should certainly be
Gill.premdeep 06:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think I think, Therefore I might possibly be.--Chrismclegless 15:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.225.205 (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
I think i will forget to indent
- I know how to indent now
- but i will probably forget later Vins0131 03:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
hi t —Preceding unsigned comment added by SNVURDAK SERVAI (talk • contribs) 18:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Indenting
- First Example
- Second
- Third
- Second
- indenting is useful
- as is numbering (ImranRamji)
Numbering and Bullets
- This is my example
- I am creating an example:
- as practice
- for a class assignment
- for class credit