User talk:Jmh123

This user is not an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

Barnstarred!

The PAW barnstar, awarded to Jmh123 for contributions to project goals. Herostratus 12:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Bret Wolfe

I appreciate your efforts and assistance in cleaning up the Bret Wolfe page. Maybe you could help me or give me guidelines on what are appropriate and not appropriate things to add. I would like to remain unbiased and give information that is relevant to Wiki. Is there a template or standard that can be applied? If items that you removed can be backed up from a magazine or press article...do I reference the article or must there be an internet link? Thanks again for your assistance and great cleanup job. Bretwolfe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bretwolfe (talk • contribs) 07:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Richard Gere

Hello, I know it was not your intention but you recently ended up doing a net removal of content here. You reverted BS (also, BLP sensitive stuff) but when you encounter things like that it is always good to check the history of the page to see if the vandalism was added entirely or if it is text that belongs on the page but was corrupted. Thanks, Brusegadi 04:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Brusegadi 04:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Michael Lucas

It's probably not the only paragraph that should be removed. I think the sourcing is good enough to back up that he wrote those particular quotations, but the paragraph (and the whole section, really) is trying to describe him and charcterize his opinions and writings in general. To me, it's too much a new analysis from primary sources: an WP:OR concern really. Mangojuice^talk 02:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

It's too bad neither of us have a real interest in this topic. The article mentions that there's a book on Lucas out there, apparently published without his involvement or approval.. but nonetheless, it's kind of too bad that the article doesn't cite that book at all. I wonder if any editors that aren't already involved has the book? B/C I don't think either of us want to get it. Mangojuice^talk 03:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey Jmh123! I would like to archive the thread at WP:COIN#Michael_Lucas_(porn_star). It seems you left your final comment there unsigned. Can you go add your real signature? I'm afraid the auto-archiver won't do its thing without real signatures. Thanks again for your work on the article. I hope you didn't have to watch any videos :-). EdJohnston 22:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Nathan Hamilton

Sorry about that. Doyley 18:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

The troublesome article, revisited

J, what has happened? I return from a two week trip overseas and I find the article so pared down (chopped up, really) that I hardly recognize it. Please drop me a line (here) and let me know. 72.68.116.51 09:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

See [1], [2] and the Lucas talk page. -Jmh123 18:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

J, what a mess! I'd seen the talk page, but not the COIN stuff. It's a good thing I was away, otherwise I would never have been able to walk away from the pc, seeing what was going on. I'd had a better time on my trip, anyway. BTW, don't take offense as I said the article was chopped up; I see you've done a lot of work to improve it, but you also had to salvage others' edits. I'm still not caught up on my sleep, owing to jet lag, but I'll touch base with you in the coming days. 72.68.123.158 20:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of Content on Fallout Boy Talk Page

While it is clearly a judgment call about a conversation being 'gratuitous,' your edit was made in good faith. Your edit summary, however, is condescending and it would be appreciated if future edit summaries are in the spirit of civility as anything else would be 'sophomoric.' the_undertow ^talk 16:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Another One Perhaps?

What do you think of User:121.247.115.123? -WarthogDemon 05:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe ask for semi-protection? -WarthogDemon 05:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hmm . . . this reply I made is not uncivil is it? -WarthogDemon 19:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)