User talk:Rjd0060: Difference between revisions
Manduck2k3 (talk | contribs) |
Manduck2k3 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
I like that, let's add db-duh. :) [[User:Corvus cornix|Corvus cornix]] 22:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
I like that, let's add db-duh. :) [[User:Corvus cornix|Corvus cornix]] 22:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
== WTV == |
|||
And yet you have WTF! |
|||
(above? WTF?) - <small> Unsigned comment left by [[User:Manduck2k3]] at 19:08, October 11, 2007 (EST).</small> |
|||
==RfA== |
==RfA== |
Revision as of 00:30, 12 October 2007
Hi, I blocked this user for an hour, because he made three edits, all to vandalize Moose, all in rapid succession, during the time you gave the user a warning. Was this proper? I tried to report it to WP:AIV, but it did not appear on the screen. Whether I messed up, or did it right, please tell me. This is my first block ever as an admin. Bearian 00:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, I am impressed by you. When are you submitting to the rigors of RfA? Bearian 00:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I had about 4 or 5,000, but I declined it outright once, and put it off again another time. The general consensus is 3,000 edit minimum. Bearian 01:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Levi Strauss
Did it occur to you to revert back to the correct version rather than to just revert back to the one with only mentions of his prostitution and the wrong born as name? Look carefully at the revisions before you revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deansherr (talk • contribs) 01:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Replied on users talk page - Rjd0060 02:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
hello!
I just wish to delete an account I have, this is the fiasco! and please please don't pretend you want to help me and just mess with my head! I just want this to end!!! a brief synopsis, I created an article-went to a vote to keep or delete- I stupidly added a few comments while un logged in and some while logged in , I'm dyslexic-so sue me. but I got on some guys radar (for all I know a friend of yours) he then accused me of being other users and did a checkuser on me, came up negative, still the guy wouldnt let go of it, he put crap on my user page that was rude! and took it off and then he locked my account, so sick of it, I have sent an email to wikipedia foundation to help. but I just want the dumb account deleted right away! its so embarassing to me and also reveals my personal info-please help ! Canuckchick007 02:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I read that, I take it you are an administrator and can help? just let me know, I don't want to go through the rig-a ma- roll of dealing with head office-they probly take forever to get back to you!, also can a user block your account because you say you will put out a wiki alert and say you made a legal threat? This was just made up to freeze up my account, I m so ticked off as the checkuser proved my innocence!Canuckchick007 02:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- anybody you would recommend?Canuckchick007 02:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- this is all so annoying! I wish he would just go away! can you do me a favor and delete the comment I put on the administration board?Canuckchick007 02:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- anybody you would recommend?Canuckchick007 02:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Recommended user to email a Bureaucrat. - Rjd0060 16:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Just to say hi, and that I'm thinking of you. Hope all's well. :) Jeeny (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm the author of the above mentioned article. After all the pictures were deleted by the admins who do not think ranks and insignias are not essential to the articles regarding armies and not deserves to be use under the fairuse criteria, I really disappointed and requested to speedy delete that. So if you think that article contains some context which is also have some encyclopedic value, then I'll keep the article as it is. Thanks --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie | tool box 17:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I have sourced the championship titles. Whether the titles are sufficient to meet notability is now the question. If you feel so inclined, please revisit the AfD and comment. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 17:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
You put one tag on it, I put a different one on, and we could even add db-repost. :) Corvus cornix 22:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I like that, let's add db-duh. :) Corvus cornix 22:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
RfA
Don't forget to study up on this. You may already know this though. Good luck, I'll support you. :) Jeeny (talk) 23:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Navigating this thing is way confusing
Navigating this thing is way confusing... I tried to post something and was in the wrong spot... can't it be easier to post?
Also I tried putting the template thing in buy the thing was deleted before I had a chance.. really you all should give more time to the noobs to figure out how to do stuff... and DUH... make it so you can't edit OTHER peoples stuff.. but thats just obvious! Manduck2k3 23:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
Now thats what I needed in the first place, if I had that I would have known how to do stuff, you should really make that the page everyone goes to when they sign up! Thanks Manduck2k3 Manduck2k3 23:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- PS: "And, even though it is your user page, it still belongs (and can be edited by) the community" Please define the community" if that means anyone then you have some warnings to remove from me as you state the above quoted.. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manduck2k3 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- UPDATED: If owned by the community means: every member, then vandalisms is imposable as you cannot vandalize your own stuff? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manduck2k3 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I read WP:OWN, and it says you shouldn't try to prevent people from editing your articals, and what not, but it does not say who the owners of what are., The problem is that you have too much stuff opened to the interpretation of someting... not to mention it shouldn't be possable to edit "home pages" or "user pages" if there not yours.... and why do i have for and not just two? sounds like all the "power" can be missused if 3 people do a warning at teh same time that gets you 3 warnings.. and the ones regarding my own artical shouldn't count because I kept tring to used the form to show I wasn't done but I couldn't get it to work! What a rip! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manduck2k3 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm only reading what you have written... I don't believe I have misinterpreted the meaning of anything you wrote, if you meant to say something else then please feel free to correct what you said.. but if you mean what you said then there are some issues here. Manduck2k3 00:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Thats one of the things I got flagged for was it not? and the woops i made to someones home page thingy I undid as soon as I realized it.. so WTV?