Talk:Pirates of the Caribbean (film series): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:59, 14 October 2007

Film B‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Delete?=

Moved from my talk page - Puck 16:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've put a WP:PROD tag on Pirates of the Caribbean films, as each separate film has a sizeable page already. If there is anything which can only be said about all three films together, fair enough, it should go on the new page, but I can't think of anything like that. Regards, Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 15:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message, but I think there's a lot to be said about all three films, which better could be described in an article about the trilogy.

Also, there are a lot of wikilinks to to the article about the franchise which I think should go to an article about the films.

Puck 15:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I don't want to delete stuff just for the sake of it, so I'll leave things as they are to give you time to develop the article as you see fit. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 17:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this can be made into a disambiguation page if one doesn't already exist.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 23:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is Pirates of the Caribbean (disambiguation), but I wanted to add more information about all three movies on 1 page (not a disambiguation page)...

After the PROD-tag was added I wondered if it was still a good idea and hoped for more discussion on this page, before I extended the article... Puck 14:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Verbinski quote

hey, I read an opinion article where he said that his comments about gore verbinski were taken out of context, should this be lef ton the page? otherwise an addendum needs to be added that says "but breathead feels his comments were taken out of context" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.233.253 (talk • contribs)

Prove it. Alientraveller 09:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://adage.com/results?search_offset=0&search_order_by=score&search_phrase=gore, http://virtualpolitik.blogspot.com/2007/05/immaterial-has-become-immaterial.html, http://www.huntleyneighbors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32541

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 hey, I read an opinion article where he said that his comments about gore verbinski were taken out of context, should this be lef ton the page? otherwise an addendum needs to be added that says "but breathead feels his comments were taken out of context" {{unsigned|24.143.233.253}}
 :Prove it. [[User:Alientraveller|Alientraveller]] 09:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
+http://adage.com/results?search_offset=0&search_order_by=score&search_phrase=gore, http://virtualpolitik.blogspot.com/2007/05/immaterial-has-become-immaterial.html,
+http://www.huntleyneighbors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=32541