Talk:Raw foodism: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
"a man big into juices" -- really good style? [[User:Mbp|Mbp]] 07:07, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
"a man big into juices" -- really good style? [[User:Mbp|Mbp]] 07:07, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
This article is amusing as it begins with one of the fundamental flawed conceptions of why humans cook food. Eggs are consumed by many living things raw without any adverse effect on their life spans. Salmonella is a common bacteria that anyone can become immune to, but most haven't because they cook their food and thus are never exposed to it. Raw eggs yolks once were a major part of many dishes without ill effects. |
|||
Revision as of 18:15, 6 June 2005
Is this different from Living foods diet where we already have an article. Rmhermen 03:30, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Not exactly. "Raw food" and "living foods" are used interchangibly within the diet, and I feel this one is more balanced. 24.229.25.11
"a man big into juices" -- really good style? Mbp 07:07, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
This article is amusing as it begins with one of the fundamental flawed conceptions of why humans cook food. Eggs are consumed by many living things raw without any adverse effect on their life spans. Salmonella is a common bacteria that anyone can become immune to, but most haven't because they cook their food and thus are never exposed to it. Raw eggs yolks once were a major part of many dishes without ill effects.