Talk:Rasputin's penis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:42, 17 October 2007

I Firmly Agree

I would just like to point out that whoever wrote "hard evidence" here is a genius.Phanatic 02:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I want to second that --UD75 19:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to agree, but I would argue that the bold type makes it too tongue-in-cheek. --Vincentvivi 13:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the best article ever. -Sk4yt 22:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eleven inches?

hes the "chief of the prostate research center of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences" and he has a curioso involving Rasputin's penis? Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest. And its a preserved penis that is 11 inches long? who makes this stuff up.

There's a conflict in that page: 11 inches is ~ 28cm. 30 cm is ~ 11 inches. Which one is correct?

Neither is correct. 11 inches is roughly 27.5cm, and 30cm is 12 inches (1 yard is 90cm, etc).

Rasputin is great. I think his penis is not just 11 inches. Maybe it's a misheard. It should be 11 metres. That's what I think.

Bullsh*t urban legend without concrete evidence of any kind

Most historians believe this story to be pure bullshit. Oh, and that thing in the jar? ITS A SEA CUCUMBER, PEOPLE.

However the article is too awesome to be removed. 88.96.135.14 12:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]