Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Circulation in macroeconomics.svg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Circulation in macroeconomics: comment |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Neutral''' It has definite potential but the caption is wholly inadequate. It needs to explain what some of these terms mean, at the very least (such as "transfer"), or what is going on in the diagram. — <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font color=black>BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<font color=gray>0918</font>]] • 2007-10-19 14:24Z</small> |
*'''Neutral''' It has definite potential but the caption is wholly inadequate. It needs to explain what some of these terms mean, at the very least (such as "transfer"), or what is going on in the diagram. — <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font color=black>BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<font color=gray>0918</font>]] • 2007-10-19 14:24Z</small> |
||
*'''Oppose''' With so many abbreviations, in order to understand the diagram the user must decode each one; a tedious process. Instead of thinking about the economics, the viewer is struggling to remember what Tr<sub>c</sub> means. Better to label it with real words rather than forcing people to memorize an arbitrary set of abbreviations, and there looks to be plenty of room on the chart. With a little creativity you could make it work. Check out the book ''The Visual Display of Quantitative Information'' by [[Edward Tufte]] (ISBN 0961392142) and his other books for some excellent tips on making charts and data displays. [[User:Jeff Dahl|Jeff Dahl]] ([[User talk:Jeff Dahl|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jeff Dahl|contribs]]) 16:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' With so many abbreviations, in order to understand the diagram the user must decode each one; a tedious process. Instead of thinking about the economics, the viewer is struggling to remember what Tr<sub>c</sub> means. Better to label it with real words rather than forcing people to memorize an arbitrary set of abbreviations, and there looks to be plenty of room on the chart. With a little creativity you could make it work. Check out the book ''The Visual Display of Quantitative Information'' by [[Edward Tufte]] (ISBN 0961392142) and his other books for some excellent tips on making charts and data displays. [[User:Jeff Dahl|Jeff Dahl]] ([[User talk:Jeff Dahl|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jeff Dahl|contribs]]) 16:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' Should be more clear to those of us who don't know much about economics. Doesn't make me want to learn more at all. [[User:NyyDave|NyyDave]] 02:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 02:26, 20 October 2007
- Reason
- Uniqe diagram, alone representing picture in the important article, help understand the relation of members, incomes contra outputs in ecomomy.
- Proposed caption
- Circulation in macroeconomics
- Articles this image appears in
- Macroeconomics
- Creator
- Beyond silence /svg by LadyofHats
- Support as nominator Beyond silence 13:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral It has definite potential but the caption is wholly inadequate. It needs to explain what some of these terms mean, at the very least (such as "transfer"), or what is going on in the diagram. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-10-19 14:24Z
- Oppose With so many abbreviations, in order to understand the diagram the user must decode each one; a tedious process. Instead of thinking about the economics, the viewer is struggling to remember what Trc means. Better to label it with real words rather than forcing people to memorize an arbitrary set of abbreviations, and there looks to be plenty of room on the chart. With a little creativity you could make it work. Check out the book The Visual Display of Quantitative Information by Edward Tufte (ISBN 0961392142) and his other books for some excellent tips on making charts and data displays. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 16:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Should be more clear to those of us who don't know much about economics. Doesn't make me want to learn more at all. NyyDave 02:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
