Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Brown falcon head: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Weak support'''. It would be much better if the whole bird is shown, but the amount of detail and clarity is great enough for a weak support from me. — <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font color=black>BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<font color=gray>0918</font>]] • 2007-10-19 15:49Z</small> |
*'''Weak support'''. It would be much better if the whole bird is shown, but the amount of detail and clarity is great enough for a weak support from me. — <small>[[User:Brian0918|<b><font color=black>BRIAN</font></b>]][[User_talk:Brian0918|<font color=gray>0918</font>]] • 2007-10-19 15:49Z</small> |
||
*'''Oppose''' The article about the Brown Falcon says that it is particularly known for its long legs and broad wingspan. The picture shows neither of these things, and it would have to in order to be of value to an article with so little other content. It's a nice shot, but for me it pretty clearly fails FPC5. [[User:SingCal|SingCal]] 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' The article about the Brown Falcon says that it is particularly known for its long legs and broad wingspan. The picture shows neither of these things, and it would have to in order to be of value to an article with so little other content. It's a nice shot, but for me it pretty clearly fails FPC5. [[User:SingCal|SingCal]] 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' per SingCal [[User:NyyDave|NyyDave]] 02:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 02:28, 20 October 2007
- Reason
- Good detail, clarity, it's sharp
- Proposed caption
- Brown Falcon, Falco berigora.
- Articles this image appears in
- Brown Falcon
- Self Nom and Support Benjamint 01:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. It would be much better if the whole bird is shown, but the amount of detail and clarity is great enough for a weak support from me. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-10-19 15:49Z
- Oppose The article about the Brown Falcon says that it is particularly known for its long legs and broad wingspan. The picture shows neither of these things, and it would have to in order to be of value to an article with so little other content. It's a nice shot, but for me it pretty clearly fails FPC5. SingCal 17:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per SingCal NyyDave 02:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)