Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridley Road Market: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
I confess!
Drfinn (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
:'''weak keep''' Although the personal journal/photo album style is distracting, it doesn't look like advertising, although it doesn't look like an encyclopedia article either. It seems verifiable enough that it could be stubbed. -[[User:Sanbeg|Steve Sanbeg]] 16:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
:'''weak keep''' Although the personal journal/photo album style is distracting, it doesn't look like advertising, although it doesn't look like an encyclopedia article either. It seems verifiable enough that it could be stubbed. -[[User:Sanbeg|Steve Sanbeg]] 16:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete'''. While I'm sure this is a nice place, the article's layout says "picture gallery" - which Wikipedia is not for. This is more suitable for a webhost, which we aren't. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 20:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Delete'''. While I'm sure this is a nice place, the article's layout says "picture gallery" - which Wikipedia is not for. This is more suitable for a webhost, which we aren't. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''<span style="background:Orange;color:Black">Dennis The Tiger</span>''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 20:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I've deleted an image. This is not advertising, its a verifiable, real world bustling market. Please don't delete it, am happy to hear words of advice.

Revision as of 21:03, 23 October 2007

Ridley Road Market (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article lacks context, lacks reliable sources, and is written in a tone that's pure advertising. In addition to this, it is unclear that this is a notable place. Prod removed without improvements. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:21, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep Although the personal journal/photo album style is distracting, it doesn't look like advertising, although it doesn't look like an encyclopedia article either. It seems verifiable enough that it could be stubbed. -Steve Sanbeg 16:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've deleted an image. This is not advertising, its a verifiable, real world bustling market. Please don't delete it, am happy to hear words of advice.