Talk:Supersampling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
corrected very old typo in my own post |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It's really quite pointless. But I agree, this should be cleared up in the article. If you were confused, someone else will be too. [[User:Xompanthy|xompanthy]] 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |
:It's really quite pointless. But I agree, this should be cleared up in the article. If you were confused, someone else will be too. [[User:Xompanthy|xompanthy]] 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
Aliasing is not simply a jagged or pixellated edge, that is overlooking the argument and most of the time a wrong approach to the real thing. As you may well know it is the overlapping of the higher frequency components and since edges contain the highest frequencies, one first notices the deformation on the edges. |
|||
Revision as of 18:47, 29 October 2007
Wouldn't the Jitter algorithm be a combination of the grid and random algorithms, not the grid and Poisson Disc algorithms? - Potski, 27th August 06
- It depends on your point of view. It's a combination of the grid and poisson disc when talking about the end result, and this is the way sampling algorithms are compared in most cases (atleast in my experience). See, it's the end result that counts, not the way you achieved it :). And there are more than four, these are just the most common ones. But yes, if you look at it from a technical point of view, you're right, it's the random and grid.
- It's really quite pointless. But I agree, this should be cleared up in the article. If you were confused, someone else will be too. xompanthy 23:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Aliasing is not simply a jagged or pixellated edge, that is overlooking the argument and most of the time a wrong approach to the real thing. As you may well know it is the overlapping of the higher frequency components and since edges contain the highest frequencies, one first notices the deformation on the edges.