User talk:Dannycali: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:52, 3 November 2007

Note: I'm in the process of handling this request, including contacting the blocking Administrator. Please have patience for the next few minutes. Anthøny 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, thank you. Dannycali 22:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read the response from the blocking admin, and it still doesn't show any concrete evidence. It's just a really strange reason to block someone, saying "they act like this user". I can say this with 100% confidence, that I have never heard of JB196, I am not JB196 or connected in any way with that user. I don't get it, I don't deserve to be banned, I'm here to help, not hurt. Dannycali 05:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannycali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

although I am basically inactive at this point, I noticed that someone banned me for being an alleged sockpuppet of JB196. I just wanted to say that is totally false. I do not use sockpuppets and I am not JB196, I don't know who that is, it is not me. I'd like to see any evidence that I am a sock of JB196, instead of one user making a bad/false accusation.

Decline reason:

Morven (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) appears to be offline at the moment, and as such I'm declining this request at this time. However, I intend to review the block fully, in light of Morven's reply to this comment at her talk page. If I don't do this within the next 24 hours, please email me with a reminder. Cheers, Anthøny 22:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 :{{takenote}} I'm in the process of handling this request, including contacting the blocking Administrator. Please have patience for the next few minutes. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 22:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 ::No rush, thank you. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 22:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
+Read the response from the blocking admin, and it still doesn't show any concrete evidence.  It's just a really strange reason to block someone, saying "they act like this user".  I can say this with 100% confidence, that I have never heard of JB196, I am not JB196 or connected in any way with that user.  I don't get it, I don't deserve to be banned, I'm here to help, not hurt. [[User:Dannycali|Dannycali]] 05:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 {{unblock reviewed|1=although I am basically inactive at this point, I noticed that someone banned me for being an alleged sockpuppet of JB196. I just wanted to say that is totally false. I do not use sockpuppets and I am not JB196, I don't know who that is, it is not me. I'd like to see any evidence that I am a sock of JB196, instead of one user making a bad/false accusation.|decline={{admin|Morven}} appears to be offline at the moment, and as such I'm declining this request '''at this time'''. However, I intend to review the block fully, in light of Morven's reply to [[User talk:Morven#Dannycali (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)|this]] comment at her [[User talk:Morven|talk page]]. If I don't do this within the next 24 hours, please [[User:AGK/Contact/Email|email me]] with a reminder. Cheers, [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] 22:43, 2 November 2007 (UTC)}}