Jump to content

User talk:Redrocket: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm comments by banned user
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
:I think only the top stats for Favre should be shown on his page. His numbers are so great that they threaten to overwhelm the entire article, and wikipedia is not just for stats and lists. I'd suppor cutting it down to the top 6-8 stats, whatever seems right, and just dropping the others. His legacy won't be his stats. [[User:Snowfire51|Snowfire51]] 05:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
:I think only the top stats for Favre should be shown on his page. His numbers are so great that they threaten to overwhelm the entire article, and wikipedia is not just for stats and lists. I'd suppor cutting it down to the top 6-8 stats, whatever seems right, and just dropping the others. His legacy won't be his stats. [[User:Snowfire51|Snowfire51]] 05:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


You must not know much about Brett Favre, all his stats that need to be listed was listed in my last edit, that's 4 more, not overwelming. Wikipedia is not just about stats, that's why there is a whole article above it. Why don't you leave Favre alone and go delete all of Marino, Elway, Manning, etc. stats that are all listed on there pages and see how far you get. If his legacy won't be his stats, then he's no better than a high school player, every person legacy is about there stats, everything he does on the field is a stat, and that's his legacy. Real smart! [[User:Flashback1990|Flashback1990]] 05:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
:: Made the edit; please comment on the talk page of Brett Favre with any thoughts you have about the edit (so if you do like it, it's there for the sake of consensus). Thanks! [[User:Skybunny|Skybunny]] 05:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:37, 6 November 2007

BB 8 (US)

I don't mean to be a tattle tale, but Melanie refuses to discuss changes on the talk page. She's told me so, among other things. :/ Oh, and thank you for your message you left on my talk page. :) - Jeeny Talk 03:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the heads up. That's what I figured, but I thought I'd at least try and give her the benefit of the doubt. I'll stay vigilant. Thanks again for helping to keep the Big Brother 8 page cleaned up, we're hooked on that show. Snowfire51 03:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we're hooked. Don't get me wrong, I really believe Melanie is a good faith editor. She's not a vandal. She just likes to do things her way, and believes what she does is right, even if it's against consensus. :/ She's just stubborn, unlike me.[citation needed] :p - Jeeny Talk 04:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Moss

"There were rumors during the 2007 NFL Draft that the Patriots and the Green Bay Packers were the two teams most interested in acquiring Moss."

I will add that, i think the packers can be put like that in the Moss article and still keep it about Randy Moss —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think your paragraph there can be put in the Brett Favre page, in a controversy section, cuz he was frustrated right?? So it might be fit for the Favre page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I added the stuff to the Brett Favre page, check it out, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.117.144.189 (talk) 04:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

Thanks for taking a look at the Favre article. Please do, if you have time, continue to watch it; the more eyes on it, the better! Skybunny 21:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll respond to the 3RR. There is an exception for community banned users, so I'll be stating the obvious, but it will save an administrator who is forced to sort this out a great deal of time. Best regards, Skybunny 04:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Replied to the 3RR. Thank you again for keeping an eye on things! Skybunny 05:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New sock

I found a new sock of User:Starwars1955, thought you would like to know since it has a canny resemblance to someone, User:Sncwfire51 haha this guy is getting creative now.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 04:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks for the notice. He's hilarious. Snowfire51 04:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Haha yeah, I actually cracked a smile when I saw that :-)
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 04:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, be on the lookout for Jcsh M, Josh M, Josh M, etc... Snowfire51 04:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah also be on the lookout for anything close to Gonzo_fan2007, that is my username, Josh M is my "real name." Ill be on the lookout.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 05:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ASU

Why wouldn't the ASU edit I did go in that spot? There was listing of the 30 game home win streak, wouldn't that streak being broken go in the same place? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gsu08 (talkcontribs) 05:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same edit was put up a few days ago by an anonymous editor, and then taken down. I'd say offhand the streak was notable for the entire University, but the details of the streak ending were more notable to the season recap. I'd say the best thing to do would probably source the final game by finding an article that mentions it, then replacing it without the "whose house" bit, which seems unencyclopedic. Good luck! Snowfire51 07:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Brett Favre again

I understand. Personally I welcomed him because I had some inclinations that he may be our o'so favorite user. I figured it would be good to know he was being watched, and if it ended up he wasn't, then I could help him out. Personally I am just trying to get through the season, when the stats are set, and then just make sure every stat is correct. Thanks and good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 18:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no problem, Im a huge cheesehead so I enjoy it. I was really hoping that our favorite editor had given up, but sadly he came back. I cannot wait until the end of the season and we can get all his stats set and hopefully things will die down. Thanks for your help. Good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 03:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(banned editor comment removed)

What do you think of this user: User:Flashback1990? Looks a little fishy to me.
Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 02:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts about the statistics suggestions on the page, there? I'm wondering if a reorg is in order. Skybunny 05:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think only the top stats for Favre should be shown on his page. His numbers are so great that they threaten to overwhelm the entire article, and wikipedia is not just for stats and lists. I'd suppor cutting it down to the top 6-8 stats, whatever seems right, and just dropping the others. His legacy won't be his stats. Snowfire51 05:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must not know much about Brett Favre, all his stats that need to be listed was listed in my last edit, that's 4 more, not overwelming. Wikipedia is not just about stats, that's why there is a whole article above it. Why don't you leave Favre alone and go delete all of Marino, Elway, Manning, etc. stats that are all listed on there pages and see how far you get. If his legacy won't be his stats, then he's no better than a high school player, every person legacy is about there stats, everything he does on the field is a stat, and that's his legacy. Real smart! Flashback1990 05:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]