Jump to content

User:SecretaryNotSure: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lensor (talk | contribs)
m fixed the reference to be clearer
Lensor (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Personal attacks ==
== Personal attacks ==
I understand that you are very adamant to keep calling the [[Nobel Prize in Economics|The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel]] a "Nobel Prize", but that does not give you the excuse to violate the [[WP:NPA]] policy. Note especially what is never acceptable: ''"Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, '''religious''', political, ethnic, or other epithets (such as against disabled people) directed against another contributor."'' (bolded for emphasis by me). I do not appreciate to be accused to be a member of a "religious sect" just because I want an article to be based on facts in stead of a common misconception. Even if you did not aim the remark at me, you must have ment someone (everyone?) with your inflammatory remark, so it is still in breach of [[WP:NPA]]. It is also extremely rude to call facts "bullshit" just because they do not conform to your personal believs on what the world should look like. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize_in_Economics&action=history].--[[User:Lensor|Lensor]] 16:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I understand that you are very adamant to keep calling the [[Nobel Prize in Economics|The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel]] a "Nobel Prize", but that does not give you the excuse to violate the [[WP:NPA]] policy. Note especially what is never acceptable: ''"Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, '''religious''', political, ethnic, or other epithets (such as against disabled people) directed against another contributor."'' (bolded for emphasis by me). I do not appreciate to be accused to be a member of a "religious sect" just because I want an article to be based on facts in stead of a common misconception. Even if you did not aim the remark at me, you must have ment someone (everyone?) with your inflammatory remark, so it is still in breach of [[WP:NPA]]. It is also extremely rude to call facts "bullshit" just because they do not conform to your personal beliefs on what the world should look like. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize_in_Economics&action=history].--[[User:Lensor|Lensor]] 16:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:02, 7 November 2007

Personal attacks

I understand that you are very adamant to keep calling the The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel a "Nobel Prize", but that does not give you the excuse to violate the WP:NPA policy. Note especially what is never acceptable: "Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious, political, ethnic, or other epithets (such as against disabled people) directed against another contributor." (bolded for emphasis by me). I do not appreciate to be accused to be a member of a "religious sect" just because I want an article to be based on facts in stead of a common misconception. Even if you did not aim the remark at me, you must have ment someone (everyone?) with your inflammatory remark, so it is still in breach of WP:NPA. It is also extremely rude to call facts "bullshit" just because they do not conform to your personal beliefs on what the world should look like. [1].--Lensor 16:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)