User talk:EpicFlame: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:42, 10 November 2007

Note: This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Threads older than 7 days old are automatically archived.

Name

I like your new name! --Mschel 22:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 02:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re your question

I would put the source as "spam e-mail" or even own work - that seems to be prevalent among screen-shots. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 01:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stockdump.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stockdump.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stockdump.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Stockdump.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 17:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

test

?

why'd u clean up my talk page. i worked very hard on creating those articles!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.108.240 (talk) 06:38, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crossposting

What did you mean regarding "aggressive crossposting," as you posted on the IP User talk:64.230.108.240‎ talk page? What is he attempting to do, by creating those articles on his talk page? --LeyteWolfer 06:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake, so i'm simply removing that crossposting... But are articles created in talk pages allowed?--Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 06:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:41, 10 November 2007 edit LeyteWolfer (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,362 edits →‎Crossposting: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:42, 10 November 2007 edit undo EpicFlame (talk \| contribs) 589 edits →‎Crossposting Next edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:

	What did you mean regarding "aggressive crossposting," as you posted on the IP User talk:64.230.108.240‎ talk page? What is he attempting to do, by creating those articles on his talk page? --[[User:LeyteWolfer\|LeyteWolfer]] 06:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)		What did you mean regarding "aggressive crossposting," as you posted on the IP User talk:64.230.108.240‎ talk page? What is he attempting to do, by creating those articles on his talk page? --[[User:LeyteWolfer\|LeyteWolfer]] 06:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
			::I made a mistake, so i'm simply removing that crossposting... But are articles created in talk pages allowed?--[[User:EpicFlame\|Flaaaaaaaaaaaming!]] 06:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)