Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlet Crusade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
re |
Neverpitch (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Keep''': Notable; [[WP:NOT#Bureaucracy|Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy]]; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not paper|Wikipedia is not paper]]; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': Notable; [[WP:NOT#Bureaucracy|Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy]]; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not paper|Wikipedia is not paper]]; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
:This argument is [[WP:HARMLESS]], and therefore irrelevant. [[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
:This argument is [[WP:HARMLESS]], and therefore irrelevant. [[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Irrelevant? I think not. It seems like a very good argument, much better than yours.--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 02:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOT#INFO]]. This page contains information that is excessively detailed, and out of proportion with the notability of the topic of ''World of Warcraft''. [[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOT#INFO]]. This page contains information that is excessively detailed, and out of proportion with the notability of the topic of ''World of Warcraft''. [[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:04, 14 November 2007
- Scarlet Crusade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No third-party sources, unnotable to non-Warcraft players, and is gamecruft with plot summaries.
There is only one source on this article, which is to a Warcraft-related book. That with no independent third-party sources, it is most likely not notable to non-players and the real world.
It also contains gamecruft, which is a likely attractor of original research, adding more of unsourced material to the article.
There are plot summaries in this article, something Wikipedia is not and should not have. IAmSasori 22:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. —IAmSasori 22:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC).
- Keep: Notable; Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy; Wikipedia is not paper; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--Neverpitch 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- This argument is WP:HARMLESS, and therefore irrelevant. User:Krator (t c) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Irrelevant? I think not. It seems like a very good argument, much better than yours.--Neverpitch 02:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT#INFO. This page contains information that is excessively detailed, and out of proportion with the notability of the topic of World of Warcraft. User:Krator (t c) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)