Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denn'Bok: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Otto4711 (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:
**And how is that a bad thing? That it violates a guideline? And how is that guideline a good thing?--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 00:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
**And how is that a bad thing? That it violates a guideline? And how is that guideline a good thing?--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 00:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
::*Yes, violating policies and guidelines is a bad thing. Perhaps you should read some of those policies and guidelines and try to understand the reasons for them before spamming AFDs with largely identical comments that bear no relationship to the topic at hand? [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 03:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
::*Yes, violating policies and guidelines is a bad thing. Perhaps you should read some of those policies and guidelines and try to understand the reasons for them before spamming AFDs with largely identical comments that bear no relationship to the topic at hand? [[User:Otto4711|Otto4711]] 03:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
:::*And they bear no relationship to the topic at hand how? The only guideline this violates (it violates no ''policies'') is [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]], a new ''guideline'' established after this article was created and which only the handful of deletionists on Wikipedia agree with, anyway. It is you spamming Wikipedia with this Articles for Deletion nonsense in an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia and turn it into a redundant version of ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' or ''[[Encarta]]''.--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 03:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:23, 14 November 2007

AfDs for this article:
Denn'Bok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete - prod removed by SPA without comment. This fictional weapon has no real-world significance and no reliable sources that establish its notability. At best this merits a sentence at Ranger (Babylon 5), not an in-universe plot summary. Otto4711 18:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, violating policies and guidelines is a bad thing. Perhaps you should read some of those policies and guidelines and try to understand the reasons for them before spamming AFDs with largely identical comments that bear no relationship to the topic at hand? Otto4711 03:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]