User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 68.14.84.60 - "berman" |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?zip=06410&last=BERMAN&first=CHRISTOPHER <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.14.84.60|68.14.84.60]] ([[User talk:68.14.84.60|talk]]) 16:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?zip=06410&last=BERMAN&first=CHRISTOPHER <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.14.84.60|68.14.84.60]] ([[User talk:68.14.84.60|talk]]) 16:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
I thought the link I provided before was good enough as this was hardly a controversial topic |
Revision as of 16:36, 15 November 2007
Delete for obvious reasons. You might want to protect it and warn the user. There is a link to the WWE Magazine cover, saying they've confirmed it (which they haven't yet). Also, could you change the expiry date for Chris Jericho, so that Protection expires on "Monday, 19th November" at "11:10pm ET" (the end of RAW). Thanks! Davnel03 18:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Good catch. In regards to the expiry time, I won't modify it. Being unprotected a couple of minutes early is not a big problem. Thanks for the heads up. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I have a full copy of the magazine in question. It is no longer "Speculation" at this point it is fact. Would you like me to scan it in for you? Pkastro 23:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- It does not matter if you have seen the magazine. I have seen the magazine. WWE has not officially announced anything, nor has Jericho, so its moot. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Page has turned blue again. Re-delete and protect. Davnel03 20:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Also, this is the users first contribution, see here. I'm guessing he's a sock of someone involved in the discussion. Davnel03 20:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Finally, I've left a comment here which you will probably want to see. Thanks! Davnel03 20:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was reviewing the block of User:Pkastro. I looked at the links you indicated for review, and... I just don't get it. I see three users editing a talk subpage. There should be no subpage, but that's hardly a reason to block anyone, especially a new user. I see no reason to ban people for discussing the contents of a wrestling article. I don't see how this is sockpuppetry either: Pkastro didn't create the page in the first place, and wasn't blocked when the other user edited the page. (Frankly, I'd more likely assume that Dudejmmp was the same as the anon user that created the page in the first place, after registering an account). Am I missing something big here? Mangojuicetalk 05:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- I was mistaken and have unblocked. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
RfA
If the offer is still open, I'm ready to be nominated as an admin. I've asked my friend User:Nahallac Silverwinds to do a co-nomination with you, and she has agreed. I'm assuming you will need to contact each other to do that. Anyway, thanks for asking me awhile back if I wanted to be an admin and waiting patiently for me to accept. Thanks. Nikki311 18:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, real cool! I'll get to it later on tonight. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Just letting you know I filled out my co-nom stuff :) --Naha|(talk) 17:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I just added my nom to the RfA main page. Nikki311 20:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Gustafson in case you did not see the professional wrestling articles have had new admin additions recently. –– Lid(Talk) 23:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok Now you're just reaching. Keep removing my edits and we can go round and round. It is a well known fact that Wendel was on MTV's True Life: I'm a gamer. I dont know why you have a vendetta against me, however, you should revolve your personal issues ASAP. I don't know you, and don't care to, however, following me around and removing my edit's will not fly. Here's the proof that you so desire. . A quick google search for "True Life I'm a Gamer" shows these results. This Link is also a copy of the video in question. I have reverted to my posting and will post my proof on the talk page. This is 100% fact. Download and Watch for yourself. Further attempts to harass me will be brought to the attention of either Jimbo Wales or the Arbitration Committee. If you have a personal issue with me that you need resolved, let me know I'll be more than happy to sort that out with you somewhere other than wikipedia. AIM/YAHOO/Telephone whatever, you just need to stop intentionally trying to derail the process. Thank you and have a great day. Pkastro 07:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Check out User talk:Badagnani#Template:Needhanzi. I'll probably respond tomorrow. -- John Reaves 08:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Berman does not hide his place of residence
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10811067&BRD=1643&PAG=461&dept_id=10486&rfi=6
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?zip=06410&last=BERMAN&first=CHRISTOPHER —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.14.84.60 (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
I thought the link I provided before was good enough as this was hardly a controversial topic