Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlet Crusade: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:17, 15 November 2007

Scarlet Crusade

No third-party sources, unnotable to non-Warcraft players, and is gamecruft with plot summaries.

There is only one source on this article, which is to a Warcraft-related book. That with no independent third-party sources, it is most likely not notable to non-players and the real world.

It also contains gamecruft, which is a likely attractor of original research, adding more of unsourced material to the article.

There are plot summaries in this article, something Wikipedia is not and should not have. IAmSasori 22:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. —IAmSasori 22:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: Notable; Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy; Wikipedia is not paper; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--Neverpitch 01:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

This argument is WP:HARMLESS, and therefore irrelevant. User:Krator (t c) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant? I think not. It seems like a very good argument, much better than yours.--Neverpitch 02:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT#INFO. This page contains information that is excessively detailed, and out of proportion with the notability of the topic of World of Warcraft. User:Krator (t c) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Then don't read it. Simple as that. No rational reason given to delete yet.--Neverpitch 02:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge to Warcraft universe. The Scarlet Crusade is a major feature of the game, being the antagonist in a number of plot threads. The source given certainly indicates notability within the scope of the game, but there's not enough external notability to justify more than a redirect to a larger article that mentions the S.C. in passing. -Harmil 15:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That would be just a "Merge" then, not a "Keep and merge". Powers ^T 13:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article asserts no notability, doesn't have any references from reliable sources, provides no critical commentary, and has no hope of any showing up. Judgesurreal777 22:00, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Neverpitch and Harmil are correct on all points above. Rray 22:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason to let this article get deleted. It's notable, as Harmil has asserted. IronCrow 22:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ::Irrelevant? I think not. It seems like a very good argument, much better than yours.--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 02:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC) {{spa|Neverpitch}}
 *'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOT#INFO]]. This page contains information that is excessively detailed, and out of proportion with the notability of the topic of ''World of Warcraft''. [[User:Krator]] ([[User talk:Krator|t]] [[Special:Contributions/Krator|c]]) 01:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
-**Then don't read it. Simple as that. No rational reason given to delete yet.--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 02:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC) {{spa|Neverpitch}}
+**Then don't read it. Simple as that. No rational reason given to delete yet.--[[User:Neverpitch|Neverpitch]] 02:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Keep and merge''' to [[Warcraft universe]]. The Scarlet Crusade is a major feature of the game, being the antagonist in a number of plot threads. The source given certainly indicates notability within the scope of the game, but there's not enough external notability to justify more than a redirect to a larger article that mentions the S.C. in passing. -[[User:Harmil|Harmil]] 15:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 **That would be just a "Merge" then, not a "Keep and merge".  [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 13:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)