Talk:Clam chowder: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 24.22.53.24 - "" |
→Oh no you didn't.: new section |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This probably doesn't have much to do with the topic in itself, but anyone who puts corn in a fish chowder should be shot. |
This probably doesn't have much to do with the topic in itself, but anyone who puts corn in a fish chowder should be shot. |
||
Same goes for anyone who eats, makes, or supports in any way the abortion that is Manhattan Chowder <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.22.53.24|24.22.53.24]] ([[User talk:24.22.53.24|talk]]) 07:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Same goes for anyone who eats, makes, or supports in any way the abortion that is Manhattan Chowder <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.22.53.24|24.22.53.24]] ([[User talk:24.22.53.24|talk]]) 07:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Oh no you didn't. == |
|||
When a suspicious statement in an article is tagged with {{citation needed}}, I fail to understand how anyone can be so hopelessly unintelligent as to think it's in any way, shape, or form okay to remove it if you're not actually including a citation. If you're so sure that in some long ago age clam chowder was clear and restaurant patrons added cream themselves, find a respectable source that agrees with you. When you inevitably can't do that, because this idea is straight up nonsense, you need to let the citation tag stay or admit defeat and delete the garbage you dropped upon this innocent article. |
|||
Revision as of 18:21, 1 December 2007
{{unreferenced} Thyme imparts a distinctive taste that sets Manhattan clam chowder apart.
what is with the reference to legal seafoods?
- Well aparantly their Clam chowder is famous. "The chain boasts that its clam chowder has been served at every U.S. presidential inauguration since 1981."
This probably doesn't have much to do with the topic in itself, but anyone who puts corn in a fish chowder should be shot. Same goes for anyone who eats, makes, or supports in any way the abortion that is Manhattan Chowder —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.53.24 (talk) 07:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh no you didn't.
When a suspicious statement in an article is tagged with [citation needed], I fail to understand how anyone can be so hopelessly unintelligent as to think it's in any way, shape, or form okay to remove it if you're not actually including a citation. If you're so sure that in some long ago age clam chowder was clear and restaurant patrons added cream themselves, find a respectable source that agrees with you. When you inevitably can't do that, because this idea is straight up nonsense, you need to let the citation tag stay or admit defeat and delete the garbage you dropped upon this innocent article.