Talk:No Platform: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Flabergast (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This is the most biased and poorly written article I have read in a long time. This clearly contravenes the aim of wikipedia. There is already a neutral article about No Platform. This was obviously written by the shameless author to support the anti-no platform stance and thus give it false credibility. |
This is the most biased and poorly written article I have read in a long time. This clearly contravenes the aim of wikipedia. There is already a neutral article about No Platform. This was obviously written by the shameless author to support the anti-no platform stance and thus give it false credibility. |
||
:You seem so passionate about it yet you didn't sign your post? Hmmmm... [[User:Atraxus|Atraxus]] 01:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:12, 2 December 2007
re NPOV template
The original author appears to disapprove of the policy. This article requires input on the history and reasons for the policy, for purely encyclopedic reasons as well as "balance". LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
re Article
This is the most biased and poorly written article I have read in a long time. This clearly contravenes the aim of wikipedia. There is already a neutral article about No Platform. This was obviously written by the shameless author to support the anti-no platform stance and thus give it false credibility.
- You seem so passionate about it yet you didn't sign your post? Hmmmm... Atraxus 01:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)