User talk:Hydrogen Iodide: Difference between revisions
→Reply: new section |
→Revert: new section |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Also, one a side note, you may have noticed that the Polish Wiki's [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_najwy%C5%BCszych_budynk%C3%B3w_w_Nowym_Jorku version] of the New York building list goes all the way down to 150 m. Are you still against expansion? I remain undecided. Cheers, [[User:Raime|<font color="blue" ><b>Rai</b></font>]]-[[User talk:Raime|<font color="green" ><b><i>me</i></b></font>]] 03:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Also, one a side note, you may have noticed that the Polish Wiki's [http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_najwy%C5%BCszych_budynk%C3%B3w_w_Nowym_Jorku version] of the New York building list goes all the way down to 150 m. Are you still against expansion? I remain undecided. Cheers, [[User:Raime|<font color="blue" ><b>Rai</b></font>]]-[[User talk:Raime|<font color="green" ><b><i>me</i></b></font>]] 03:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Revert == |
|||
What comment did I remove from the talk page? What talk page? I'm sure it was a mistake with me copying and pasting...I had to copy and paste the whole article to get it right because of an edit conflict that had nothing to do with you...DON'T REVERT...THEN YOU WILL BE JUST REMOVING MY CONTRIBUTION TO THE TALK PAGE!!! Please just add your contribution again. <u>I will not be contributing to the talk page any-longer unless someone removes one of my previous posts</u> Kind of rude of you to tell me I made a mistake and not tell me what it was. You could have at least included a link to the talk page you were referring to! [[User:I love webcomics|I love webcomics]] 21:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:58, 2 December 2007
 | Notice: Image discussion (e.g. replaceable fair use, fair use rationale) go here in order to keep this page uncluttered after being here one day. |
Discussion Conventions
- Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion.
- Please sign your comments. Type
~~~~after your text or use the edit toolbar. - Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.
See: Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.
|
Reply
I think that we should hold off a little while longer. I think that lists like the New York and Houston lists will simply not pass with so many redlinks; I have so far received two comments (not opposes, though) in the Detroit list's second nom about two redlinks (the only ones in the entire article) in the timeline section. I think we should hold off on all lists until there are only about 5 to 10% redlinks in all entries, and I am still concerned about the completeness of the Dubai list. Specifically, which ones were you thinking? Hong Kong, Dubai, Seattle, Las Vegas ... ?
Also, one a side note, you may have noticed that the Polish Wiki's version of the New York building list goes all the way down to 150 m. Are you still against expansion? I remain undecided. Cheers, Rai-me 03:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Revert
What comment did I remove from the talk page? What talk page? I'm sure it was a mistake with me copying and pasting...I had to copy and paste the whole article to get it right because of an edit conflict that had nothing to do with you...DON'T REVERT...THEN YOU WILL BE JUST REMOVING MY CONTRIBUTION TO THE TALK PAGE!!! Please just add your contribution again. I will not be contributing to the talk page any-longer unless someone removes one of my previous posts Kind of rude of you to tell me I made a mistake and not tell me what it was. You could have at least included a link to the talk page you were referring to! I love webcomics 21:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)