Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diefenbaker (wolf): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: Line 8:
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional characters|list of Fictional characters-related deletions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Quasirandom|Quasirandom]] ([[User talk:Quasirandom|talk]]) 19:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional characters|list of Fictional characters-related deletions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Quasirandom|Quasirandom]] ([[User talk:Quasirandom|talk]]) 19:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. ''[[Due South]]'' has enough info about who played Diefenbaker, and really, how much more is there to say? (However, the two articles disagree, so it would be nice to have that checked.) [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 21:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. ''[[Due South]]'' has enough info about who played Diefenbaker, and really, how much more is there to say? (However, the two articles disagree, so it would be nice to have that checked.) [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 21:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
*'''Merge/Redirect''' to Due South [[Special:Contributions/132.205.99.122|132.205.99.122]] ([[User talk:132.205.99.122|talk]]) 20:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:21, 12 December 2007

Diefenbaker (wolf)

Diefenbaker (wolf) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article has no references to establish its notability per WP:FICTION and also lacks sources per WP:RS. As such, it is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the television series Due South and is duplicative of them. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge - into what I don't know, but the article is a stub and lacking in sources. Could maybe be redone when there is sufficient information to warrant a new article. mattbuck (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]