Talk:Calvin Klein (fashion house): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→isn't it "ck Calvin Klein" not "cK Calvin Klein"?: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== isn't it "ck Calvin Klein" not "cK Calvin Klein"? == |
== isn't it "ck Calvin Klein" not "cK Calvin Klein"? == |
||
do check this logo out on their official page [http://www.calvinklein.com/ck/] |
do check this logo out on their official page [http://www.calvinklein.com/ck/]<blockquote></blockquote> |
||
also check this out, noticed that all PVH's description of ck Calvin Klein has ck in lower caps. [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_ckCalvinKlein.html] [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_Jewelry.html] [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_Fragrance.html] |
also check this out, noticed that all PVH's description of ck Calvin Klein has ck in lower caps. [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_ckCalvinKlein.html] [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_Jewelry.html] [http://www.pvh.com/Brand_CK_Fragrance.html] |
||
Revision as of 05:21, 18 December 2007
Well, maybe you should first cite your sources.
Sinclair talk/contribs 04:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Merge
I do personally think ck Calvin Klein deserve it's own article. As firstly, it would allow further expansion on the the brand ck Calvin Klein. Second, it would be consistant with Calvin Klein Collecton having its own article. Sebastian.republic (talk) 04:37, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
isn't it "ck Calvin Klein" not "cK Calvin Klein"?
do check this logo out on their official page [1]
also check this out, noticed that all PVH's description of ck Calvin Klein has ck in lower caps. [2] [3] [4]
therefore, do u think it is appropriate it lower case all cK to ck?
further, perhaps this would call for an update of the logo used in this article?