User talk:Nonexistant User: Difference between revisions
→The Wessex Children: new section |
Alihasnain (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at [[WPT:BRoy#The Wessex Children|WikiProject British Royalty]]. Yours in anticipation, <sup>†</sup> '''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[WP:BRoy|B]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|D]]''' 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at [[WPT:BRoy#The Wessex Children|WikiProject British Royalty]]. Yours in anticipation, <sup>†</sup> '''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[WP:BRoy|B]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|D]]''' 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
Flase information can not be added to wikipedia and you should see the guielines of wikipedia on what can be and what can not be added to wikipedia instead of spreading rumours |
|||
Revision as of 14:59, 21 December 2007
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nonexistant_User. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
<div class="metadata divbox divbox-blue" title="If you talk here, I'll reply here. If I talk there, please reply there. Comments by unregistered editors will be removed. " >
Discussion Archives
|
I wasn't at all clear on the Jenna Bush talk page - what I was trying to say is it possible to vandalize Google summaries? That summary was for the wikipedia link - the number 1 Google result for Jenna Bush. It could be a coincidence that on 12/13 Google just happened to cache a vandalized version but I always doubt coincidences. I'm asking if this needs to be guarded against and if so how?BillpSea (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- I understand that, but it's not really a comment for the discussion page of that article. Probably a question to post on the admin noticeboard. --Strothra (talk) 03:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed that you refactored one of my comments on User talk:200.97.228.41. I'm assuming this was just a mistake. Please try to be more careful in the future. Cheers! Newtman (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Strange, must of been my browser. I certainly did not move your comment, simply added an NPOV warning. Please note, however, that you simply reverted the talk page and thus removed my warning- - please try to be more careful in the future. --Strothra (talk) 06:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, wanted to spend as little time on his page as possible. As I'm sure you can understand ;) Newtman (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hah, I agree :). Thanks. --Strothra (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, wanted to spend as little time on his page as possible. As I'm sure you can understand ;) Newtman (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
The Wessex Children
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, † DBD 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Flase information can not be added to wikipedia and you should see the guielines of wikipedia on what can be and what can not be added to wikipedia instead of spreading rumours