Talk:HackThisSite: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 59.183.131.99 - "→Alive ?: new section" |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Is the site still alive ? cause i just checked and it says unable to connect to site. My internet/browser's fault ? or not.... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/59.183.131.99|59.183.131.99]] ([[User talk:59.183.131.99|talk]]) 11:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Is the site still alive ? cause i just checked and it says unable to connect to site. My internet/browser's fault ? or not.... <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/59.183.131.99|59.183.131.99]] ([[User talk:59.183.131.99|talk]]) 11:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
=== hmm === |
|||
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=hackthissite.org |
|||
apparently its still alive... |
|||
but i cant get to it either, and going to it by ip:207.210.114.50 doesn't wanna work... |
|||
maybe some server errors of some sort. --[[Special:Contributions/67.70.44.247|67.70.44.247]] ([[User talk:67.70.44.247|talk]]) 23:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:48, 26 December 2007
Archived
The old discussion page has now been archived. You can view it with the navigation box above. -- Kerowren (talk • contribs • count) 16:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't use discussion sections for articles as forums. Also the quality of the writing seems like it should be improved. Its always been an issue in keeping things neutral but that isn't the issue. The issue is that it talks about things from an insiders perspective assuming the audience knows about HTS which makes it harder for newcomers to use wiki as a source to understand or learn about HTS. I'm referring specific to assumptions that wiki readers know what rm -rf is (despite it being obvious to anyone with UNIX experience). There are other examples but its redundant to specific each one. -dtg
- Assuming that the 'Disputes and Internal Problems' section talks about the December 2007 incident, then it's slightly missleading. It says "Critical Security's founder, in the wake of HTS's recent takedown, has proclaimed his independence from the site, and his intent to separate himself from the politics and controversy surrounding it". I'm not the founder of it, as far as I know Mcaster was the founder of the CS domain. Also I said "merging HTS and CS should be possible without merging the management of HTS and CS" (Incident writeup). I don't want to claim CS as independent from HTS at a communal or logical level, only at the physical level. -Sid 86.132.41.250 (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Should also be noted that spiffomatic64 was not a founder. While he created the first non xec mission/level that does not qualify him as a founder. I already discussed this with him to confirm this is true. -dtg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dtg (talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Alive ?
Is the site still alive ? cause i just checked and it says unable to connect to site. My internet/browser's fault ? or not.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.131.99 (talk) 11:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
hmm
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=hackthissite.org
apparently its still alive...
but i cant get to it either, and going to it by ip:207.210.114.50 doesn't wanna work...
maybe some server errors of some sort. --67.70.44.247 (talk) 23:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)