Talk:Binary scaling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Re-scaling after multiplication: The X's in the example should be replaced with 1's, since that is the number used in the following exampt (i think) -- [[User:137.248.143.158|137.248.143.158]] 07:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
Re-scaling after multiplication: The X's in the example should be replaced with 1's, since that is the number used in the following exampt (i think) -- [[User:137.248.143.158|137.248.143.158]] 07:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
"Although floating point has taken over to a large degree, where speed and extra accuracy are required, binary scaling is faster and more accurate." |
|||
Binary scaling is faster and more accurate where speed and extra accuracy is required? I don't get it. [[Special:Contributions/213.221.94.52|213.221.94.52]] ([[User talk:213.221.94.52|talk]]) 13:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:45, 7 January 2008
The category should be computer science but I do not know the source syntax ~~
Re-scaling after multiplication: The X's in the example should be replaced with 1's, since that is the number used in the following exampt (i think) -- 137.248.143.158 07:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
"Although floating point has taken over to a large degree, where speed and extra accuracy are required, binary scaling is faster and more accurate."
Binary scaling is faster and more accurate where speed and extra accuracy is required? I don't get it. 213.221.94.52 (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)