User talk:Pandabearcollective: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:16, 7 January 2008

Please refrain from making judgments on what constitutes factual and objective information. You have been identified as a representative of a commercial reputation management company hired by Kingston University to prevent accurate information from being put forth. Please realize that such commercial ventures are strictly barred from editing Wikipedia pages on behalf of their clients. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.51.176 (talk) 01:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid not. Please remember Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not here for you to add your own commentary or personal analysis.

--Pandabearcollective (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for Kingston University and/or a reputation management company hired by Kingston University, you should not be involved in whitewashing factual information referenced from external sources. If you are not convinced about the veracity of the information, I would be happy to discuss the sourcing with you, but you ought not to simply remove it on your own.

I would like to resolve this matter with you in order to avoid the need for formal dispute resolution. So let's try to agree to come to some understanding regarding the inclusion of accurate information, even if you find it to be unflattering. I can assure you, it is not mere personal commentary or analysis. It is well-researched factual information.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 : I'm afraid not. Please remember Wikipedia is an '''encyclopedia''' and not here for you to add your own commentary or personal analysis.
 --[[User:Pandabearcollective|Pandabearcollective]] ([[User talk:Pandabearcollective#top|talk]]) 08:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
+If you work for Kingston University and/or a reputation management company hired by Kingston University, you should not be involved in whitewashing factual information referenced from external sources.  If you are not convinced about the veracity of the information, I would be happy to discuss the sourcing with you, but you ought not to simply remove it on your own.
+I would like to resolve this matter with you in order to avoid the need for formal dispute resolution.  So let's try to agree to come to some understanding regarding the inclusion of accurate information, even if you find it to be unflattering.  I can assure you, it is not mere personal commentary or analysis.  It is well-researched factual information.