User talk:Butterfly0fdoom

Toyota NA Model History: MY 09 Additions

That would work, though I think you are "right-er"; ultimately it's speculation until they show up on the showroom floor (Toyota has pushed models back before, 09 Corolla was supposed to be new in Fall of 07). Unsourced is unsourced, its all spec. until the product is on market. My apologies again for the attitude. Sahrin 19:05, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Mis-read your comments, my apologies. Sahrin 18:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Prius

I saw the tag on this article saying that it needs clean up. I plan to clean it up and make it an article that readers will like. I want to develop a consensus so I will only do a little at a time so that people can see and approve it.

I checked all the images and they are all free use. Later, I'll help select photos but will hold off as this may be controversial. I started a little re-writing the models. I will work on this slowly before moving to a new section.

I'm writing to you because you have edited that article several times. I won't edit everyday but that does not mean I forgot about the article. Congolese (talk) 03:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to expand the article where it counts, like about the car. I'd like to shrink the article where it's actually a content fork and should be under hybrid technology (just as other cars don't go into great detail about how a gasoline engine works). I put a note under the talk page for the car about taking out some of the engine technology stuff.

Overall, I think the article will shrink a bit when it's done. Ok with you? I would like to see the article focused on the car.Congolese (talk) 22:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Also see the talk page about deleting or shrinking the subsection about disappointing fuel consumption to 1 sentence (and probably relocating the sentence). After all, there is dissatisfaction about US EPA fuel consumption estimates (mpg) in general, not specifically about the Prius mpg. Here's your chance to form a consensus (on the talk page). I purposely discuss deletions before doing it to avoid edit wars. Congolese (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

New points raised in the Prius talk page. I don't want to be too knife happy so I'm doing it slowly and talking about it first. Over time, I think the article can be better. Congolese (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I think the article is better but still could use some work. Will work on it but probably not everyday. Congolese fufu (talk) 03:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

My name

I got my name changed by a bureaucrat. I saw that someone called Laos got blocked because of the name. Laos is a name of a country. Congolese is the name of the people of Congo. I didn't want any trouble so I asked for a new name. I am letting you know because you knew me from before (as Congolese).

I am going to wait for a few days for my Toyota Prius suggestions to be seen. Then I think I'll do some trimming. In the last few days, some people who I think want to keep most of the stuff have appeared. No worry, we can discuss it and reach an agreement. I know that I'm a nice person who is reasonable. Congolese fufu (talk) 03:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

California High Speed Rail

I would appreciate you telling me why you undid my revision in the California HSR page, rather than undoing my revision without giving a legitimate reason. Native94080 (talk) 07:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Native94080

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Macau

Hi? I would like to invite you to give me some opinions/comments and vote over the page of FAC: Macau so that more improvement can be made. Thanks! Coloane (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

goodbye

Because of overzealous attacks against me by Jehochman, I will no longer be editing the three articles that I was working towards FA status nor Congo articles. Jehochman went on a rampage RFCU. His RFCU claims were disproven and according to another user, he lied about the category.

WP:SOCK#LEGIT allows multiple accounts for segregation and security. The multiple accounts edited separate articles.

A multiple account was necessary because of the controversial nature of User:Profg. Editing about him would bring stalkers to the 3 FA contenders. Edits about User:Profg were never meant to defend him but to point out things that the community was overlooking. The community shouldn’t overlook everything that a user says simply because he is bad. One member of the community said he was seeking a ban just to make it easier to accuse others. These is a diabolical scheme.

What good does is exposing User:HappyBirthdayClubMember? That’s like exposing the identity of Santa Claus. Congolese fufu (talk) 02:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)