Interactional justice: Difference between revisions
m Categorizing article - You can help! |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
'''Interactional Justice'''' - |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Interactional justice has come to be seen as consisting of two specific types of interpersonal treatment (e.g. Greenberg, 1990a, 1993b). The first labeled interpersonal justice, reflects the degree to which people are treated with politeness, dignity, and respect by authorities or third parties involved in executing procedures or determining outcomes. The second, labeled informational justice, focuses on the explanations provided to people that convey information about why procedures were used in a certain way or why outcomes were distributed in a certain fashion. |
Interactional justice has come to be seen as consisting of two specific types of interpersonal treatment (e.g. Greenberg, 1990a, 1993b). The first labeled interpersonal justice, reflects the degree to which people are treated with politeness, dignity, and respect by authorities or third parties involved in executing procedures or determining outcomes. The second, labeled informational justice, focuses on the explanations provided to people that convey information about why procedures were used in a certain way or why outcomes were distributed in a certain fashion. |
||
Revision as of 07:47, 27 January 2008
Interactional Justice' is the degree to which the people affected by decision are treated with politeness, dignity, and respect. Focusing on the interpersonal treatment people receive when procedures arre implemented.
Interactional justice has come to be seen as consisting of two specific types of interpersonal treatment (e.g. Greenberg, 1990a, 1993b). The first labeled interpersonal justice, reflects the degree to which people are treated with politeness, dignity, and respect by authorities or third parties involved in executing procedures or determining outcomes. The second, labeled informational justice, focuses on the explanations provided to people that convey information about why procedures were used in a certain way or why outcomes were distributed in a certain fashion. (Sam Fricchione 2006). Where more adequacy of explanation is prevalent, the perceived level of informational justice is higher.
Interactional justice is degree to which the people affected by decision are treated by dignity and respect. ( John R. Schermerhorn, Organizational behavior)
 | This sociology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |